[governance] IGF and Enhanced Cooperation

[Thomas Lowenhaupt]

Jeremy and Norbert,

With ICANN's initial new TLD process having recently closed, and with 
hearsay indicating that several cities have applied for TLDs, perhaps 
the Enhanced Cooperation framework might be piloted on city TLDs. Then, 
with success, it might be broadened.

Best,

Tom Lowenhaupt

On 6/1/2012 5:37 AM, Jeremy Malcolm wrote:
> Sorry, I'll just disable the blasted digital signature for good.
>
> On 01/06/12 17:11, Norbert Bollow wrote:
>> My vision for Enhanced Cooperation is to put both areas together, 
>> jointly, under a single institutional "Enhanced Cooperation Task 
>> Force" framework, modeled to some extent on the IETF, and a single 
>> set of process principles that are designed to operate as closely as 
>> possible to what Daniel Kalchev calls "the 'common sense' law that 
>> every human being on this planet knows unconditionally". The output 
>> of this "Enhanced Cooperation Task Force" would be Request For Action 
>> (RFA) documents, which analogously to RFCs would not have direct 
>> legal force, but they'd be informative and persuasive and maybe 
>> eventually any government that doesn't follow the recommendations of 
>> the RFAs without giving really good reasons for choosing differently 
>> will get voted out of office quickly. 
>
> Really interesting and audacious.  Back in 1997 ISOC formed an 
> Internet Societal Task Force (ISTF) that was intended as a counterpart 
> to the IETF and the IRTF, but dealing with public policy issues.  It 
> never took off due to lack of involvement by governments and was 
> eventually superseded by WSIS the following year.  Actually when I 
> commenced my doctoral studies on Internet governance my intention was 
> also to propose an IETF-like body for public policy issues, though 
> what I eventually proposed bore more less resemblance to the IETF.  
> Others (including Avri) made similar proposals that the IGF should 
> adopt an IETF-like model: see 
> http://www.intgovforum.org/contributions/IETF-as-model.pdf.
>
> So whilst I would have opposed this if the CSTD had recommended to 
> form its on working group on EC, since they didn't, I would support us 
> forming one anyway, and inviting governments to participate in it.  I 
> foresee that they will ignore the invitation because the group hasn't 
> been formed by the UN, but let's do it anyway and see how much 
> traction the group can get without them.
>
> -- 
>
> *Dr Jeremy Malcolm
> Senior Policy Officer*
> Consumers International
> Kuala Lumpur Office for Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
> Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur, 
> Malaysia
> Tel: +60 3 7726 1599
>
> Follow @ConsumersInt <http://twitter.com/Consumers_Int>
>
> Like us at www.facebook.com/consumersinternational 
> <http://www.facebook.com/consumersinternational>
>
> Read our email confidentiality notice 
> <http://www.consumersinternational.org/email-confidentiality>. Don't 
> print this email unless necessary.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20120601/95ae617f/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t