[governance] FBI, DEA, IPv6 & ICANN

[William Drake]

On Jul 5, 2012, at 6:13 PM, John Curran wrote:

> On Jul 5, 2012, at 12:01 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
>> 
>> As for Civil society participation, yes we should participate more, but whenever it is civil society on privacy vs. LEA on security, LEA trumps the privacy nuts in the eyes of decision makers. Hence my insistence that you need to work hard to get the privacy officials on the room every time you talk to LEA.
>> 
>> Just a thought
> 
> It's a good thought... If I see a policy proposal actually submitted in this 
> area, I will insure that this list is notified so that those interested can 
> get involved.  Even comments made via remote participation can awaken folks
> to policy aspects and implications of which they are otherwise unaware.

Actually, Avri pressed this in NCSG's meeting with the Board in Prague, and there seemed to be agreement that asking the LEAs whether they'd checked with their respective governments' privacy people when formulating proposals was a reasonable first step.  Sort of a concrete proposal for you, John.

CS inputs into actual governance processes can matter…

Bill
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t