[governance] Internationalization of IANA oversight

Tue Jul 3 10:55:36 EDT 2012

Hi,

I've shut up for a while on the list as others carry the conversation forward, but want to give Bertrand a +1 for:

"to ensure the integrity of the root zone file by guaranteeing that no one, voluntarily or involuntarily, can tamper with the root zone file"

as one worthy target of....IGF/ECTF.  If an alternate mechanism, or should I say administrative procedure, for ensuring that can be defined, or at least proposed, by say 2015, as Bertrand suggests, then yeah maybe Ian's wish of getting NTIA out of the engine room without other governments rushing in, can eventually be achieved. Just one part of the puzzle; but the root of all Internet governance puzzles is a key one to solve.

Lee

________________________________
From: governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org [governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org] on behalf of Bertrand de La Chapelle [bdelachapelle at gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 7:44 AM
To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org; John Curran
Cc: Ian Peter
Subject: Re: [governance] Internationalization of IANA oversight

Thanks John,

On a personal note, this issue requires to first formulate a common objective for all actors.

I believe such an objective is : "to ensure the integrity of the root zone file by guaranteeing that no one, voluntarily or involuntarily, can tamper with the root zone file". This is a common concern and interest for all actors: governments, businesses, civil society actors and DNS operators. I have had the opportunity during the last few years to test this formulation with a broad range of players and it seems to be accepted by all, which could be a good starting point.

The bottom line is no evolution will be possible without ensuring that the US has as much certainty as it has today that no one will be able to tamper with the RZF, while offering all other actors, including other governments, the same certainty. Various avenues can be explored to ensure such an outcome.

The IANA contract has just been renewed with ICANN for a period of three years (up to october 2015) with two possible extensions of one year. The increased transparency in the IANA process that it will establish will be part of the progress towards the objective.

Further discussions will have to take place to identify whatever evolution could be envisaged. An important topic indeed.

Best

Bertrand

On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 3:55 PM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net<mailto:jcurran at arin.net>> wrote:
On Jun 26, 2012, at 7:55 AM, Ian Peter wrote:

> But has ICANN, ISOC, RIRs, IANA or any other relevant body ever formally
> raised change in this particular area (root zone authorisation) with DOC, in
> the formal way in which change was suggested on the JPA agreement which
> eventually led to the AOC?

Yes, as formal comments into NTIA's IANA Functions contract solicitation:

<http://www.ntia.doc.gov/federal-register-notices/2011/request-comments-internet-assigned-numbers-authority-iana-functions>

ARIN -
"It is no surprise that NTIA would undertake a comprehensive review of the IANA
functions, given the IANA functions are an essential piece of the overall
foundation of the Internet.  No one would disagree that the Internet has grown
and evolved significantly since the first IANA functions contract in 2000.  With this
success comes a more diverse global community of stakeholders with new
concerns and expectations. In order to continue to build confidence in the
Internet, it is critical that the IANA functions be managed in a way that is open,
transparent and globally accountable.  This comprehensive review is just one
step in the eventual internationalization of oversight of the IANA functions."

NRO -
"In a recent letter to ICANN, the NRO introduced a proposal for moving forward in the relationship between ICANN and the US Government: “The NRO suggests that ICANN, through these coming negotiations, should advocate for a staged reduction of the level of DoC’s oversight to IANA. This process could possibly involve a transition from a contract to a cooperative agreement, and ultimately arrival at a non-binding arrangement, such as an affirmation of commitments (mirroring, of course, the successful progression in the relationship between ICANN itself and the US government).”

ISOC -
"For the Internet Society, it remains important for the IANA functions to continue to be a part of the Internet ecosystem, and that the IANA functions operator is permitted to continue its evolution toward becoming an internationally-accepted, private sector (i.e., multistakeholder) entity. This approach needs to be maintained and enhanced, as it is best suited to serving the global public interest."

ICANN -
"ICANN urges the DOC to evolve the IANA functions framework following the model set forth in the Affirmation of Commitments. By incorporating the principles of transparency and global accountability, and providing a clear path toward transitioning the IANA functions to the private sector, the DOC can finally complete the objective it set forth in the White Paper over a decade ago: to allow for global participation in the management of Internet names and addresses."

FYI,
/John

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org<mailto:governance at lists.igcaucus.org>
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t

--
____________________
Bertrand de La Chapelle
Program Director, International Diplomatic Academy
Member, ICANN Board of Directors
Tel : +33 (0)6 11 88 33 32

"Le plus beau métier des hommes, c'est d'unir les hommes" Antoine de Saint Exupéry
("there is no greater mission for humans than uniting humans")

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20120703/b363be13/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t