mixed threads and declaring consensus (WAS Re: [governance] Re: Managing Critical Internet Resources [IGF 2012 - MAG Consultations])

[McTim]

Hi,

On 2/28/12, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro
<salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> We would like to thank Paul Lehto for craftsmanship in weaving critical
> considerations in relation to Human Rights and the Internet. Noting that
> the Statement has been up for more than 48 hours, we also thank all those
> that contributed to the Statement Workspace (web) and email thread.
>
> It is now the 29th February, 2012 and we will be sending our Statement.

Did you just declare consensus?

How are you and Izumi measuring consensus?  Is it "no objection,
therefore everyone agrees"?


-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t