[governance] Re: Managing Critical Internet Resources [IGF 2012 - MAG Consultations]
Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro
salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com
Mon Feb 27 12:29:18 EST 2012
Dear Bill, Schombe, Robert and Imran,
Thank you for your comments and contributions.
Kind Regards,
Sala
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:05 AM, Imran Ahmed Shah <ias_pk at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Please also include the Wireless Network Infrastructure as a Critical
> Internet Source.
> In some countries, including Pakistan, has implanted ban to use of ISM
> Frequency.
>
> In our country, Thousands Installations of Wireless Pairs (operating on 24
> / 5.8 GHz) has become illegal. Millions Dollar Investment has become
> waste. These equipment provides a good reliable service (for data and
> internet) connectivity upto 25-30 Km. While there is no alternate (for long
> distance) is available in most of the areas, even Microwave Radio link
> solution some times not feasible because, two different Radio Links can not
> be installed on same tower/pole (technically) on same building.
>
> Some countries already had ban on use of ISM Band e.g. Saudi Arabia, even
> it is acceptable but in some countries, since 1996, it was open for use and
> was using widely/openly but sudden change in regulations developed problem
> for all kind of users.
> Best Regards
> Imran
>
> ------------------------------On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 8:22 PM PKT Carlos A.
> Afonso wrote:>Good, Captain Drake! :)>>--c.a.>>On 02/27/2012 09:00 AM,
> William Drake wrote:>> Hi Sala>> >> Please include:>> WCIT and the ITRs>>
> Enhanced cooperation, and other intergovernmental initiatives (e.g. China,
> Russia, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan)>> Progress and impact of new gTLDs>>
> Territoriality and jurisdiction over CIRs>> Thanks>> >> Bill>> >> On Feb
> 27, 2012, at 11:44 AM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote:>> >> Dear
> All,>>>> If there are no further contributions to this thread, we will have
> to wrap up the suggestions and consolidate to send to the current MAG
> members.>>>> Kind Regards,>> Sala>>>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 5:48 AM,
> Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro <salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com>
> wrote:>> ---------- Forwarded message - --------->> From: Louis Pouzin
> (well) <pouzin at well.com>>> Date: Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 15:17>> Subject:
> [governance] On the MAG thematic
> working groups>> To: "Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro" <
> salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com>>>>> Hi Sala,>>>> I'd be interested
> in a sub-theme within managing critical internet resources:>>>> Multiple
> name spaces in internet>> - diversity of language scripts>> - regional
> spaces>> - brand names management>> - diversisty of jurisdictions>> -
> directory structures>> - name collisions>> - scopes>> -
> inter-operability>> - (more)>>>> Worth a workshop with a half dozen
> stakeholders.>>>> I agree with Louis' suggestion. I hav>>>> Cheers>>>>>> On
> Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Lee W McKnight <lmcknigh at syr.edu> wrote:>>
> Sala,>>>> My 2 cents: I see 3 topics here not 5:>>>>>> 1) IXPs &
> MIGRATION OF RESOURCES>>>> Transitioning from IPv4 to IPv6 [Shared
> Lessons]>> Getting various stakeholders within developing countries
> particularly policy makers to see the linkages - encouraging greater
> cohesion in the area of policy;>> It will be good to see various
> regulatory practices around the world etc>> >> 2) [SMART GRIDS] &
> INTERNET OF THINGS>>>> Personally I call this category - wireless grids.
> fyi we are on track towards releasing version 0.1 open specs March 26 @
> TEDxHarlem. Anyway, smart grids, generally speaking, aren't that smart;
> and the 'things' in isolation are just - things. So real issue is how does
> one share resources among grids and things; and not pretend all life will
> be in the cloud so who needs to worry our pretty little heads about who
> controls what - resources, including things.>>>> In sum, imho these 2
> together are more interesting and relevant for IGF than either alone, which
> odds are would turn into corporate sales pitches for particular big
> brands...in the usual suspect category>>>> 3) SPECTRUM ALLOCATION FOR
> MOBILE SERVICES AND THE DIMENSION OF PUBLIC INTEREST>>>>>>>> (Sounds good
> to me; though I wonder what our ITU friends will think of IGF engaging on
> spectrum allocation
> ; )>>>> >> >
>
--
Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala
Tweeter: @SalanietaT
Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro
Cell: +679 998 2851
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20120228/6b898dab/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
For all other list information and functions, see:
http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
http://www.igcaucus.org/
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list