[governance] Re: Managing Critical Internet Resources [IGF 2012 - MAG Consultations]

[Carlos A. Afonso]

Good, Captain Drake! :)

--c.a.

On 02/27/2012 09:00 AM, William Drake wrote:
> Hi Sala
> 
> Please include:
> WCIT and the ITRs
> Enhanced cooperation, and other intergovernmental initiatives (e.g. China, Russia, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan)
> Progress and impact of new gTLDs
> Territoriality and jurisdiction over CIRs
> Thanks
> 
> Bill
> 
> On Feb 27, 2012, at 11:44 AM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote:
> 
>> Dear All,
>>
>> If there are no further contributions to this thread, we will have to wrap up the suggestions and consolidate to send to the current MAG members.
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>> Sala
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 5:48 AM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro <salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com> wrote:
>> ---------- Forwarded message - ---------
>> From: Louis Pouzin (well) <pouzin at well.com>
>> Date: Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 15:17
>> Subject: [governance] On the MAG thematic working groups
>> To: "Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro" <salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com>
>>
>> Hi Sala,
>>
>> I'd be interested in a sub-theme within managing critical internet resources:
>>
>> Multiple name spaces in internet
>>  - diversity of language scripts
>>  - regional spaces
>>  - brand names management
>>  - diversisty of jurisdictions
>>  - directory structures
>>  - name collisions
>>  - scopes
>>  - inter-operability
>>  - (more)
>>
>> Worth a workshop with a half dozen stakeholders.
>>
>> I agree with Louis' suggestion. I hav
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Lee W McKnight <lmcknigh at syr.edu> wrote:
>> Sala,
>>
>> My 2 cents:  I see 3 topics here not 5:
>>
>>
>> 1)    IXPs &   MIGRATION OF RESOURCES
>>
>> Transitioning from IPv4 to IPv6 [Shared Lessons]
>> Getting various stakeholders within developing countries particularly policy makers to see the linkages - encouraging greater cohesion in the area of policy;
>> It will be good to see various regulatory practices around the world etc
>>   
>> 2)    [SMART GRIDS] &   INTERNET OF THINGS
>>
>> Personally I call this category - wireless grids. fyi we are on track towards releasing version 0.1 open specs March 26 @ TEDxHarlem.  Anyway, smart grids, generally speaking, aren't that smart; and the 'things' in isolation are just - things. So real issue is how does one share resources among grids and things; and not pretend all life will be in the cloud so who needs to worry our pretty little heads about who controls what - resources, including things.
>>
>> In sum, imho these 2 together are more interesting and relevant for IGF than either alone, which odds are would turn into corporate sales pitches for particular big brands...in the usual suspect category
>>
>> 3)    SPECTRUM ALLOCATION FOR MOBILE SERVICES AND THE DIMENSION OF PUBLIC INTEREST
>>
>>
>>
>> (Sounds good to me; though  I wonder what our ITU friends will think of IGF engaging on spectrum allocation ; )
>>
>>  
> 

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t