[governance] Mass use of encryption? Banks deeply involved in FBI-coordinated suppression of Occupy Wall Steet
Riaz K Tayob
riaz.tayob at gmail.com
Mon Dec 31 09:20:34 EST 2012
Is mass use of encryption a good idea?
Riaz
Banks Deeply Involved in FBI-Coordinated Suppression of
"Terrorist" Occupy Wall Street
<http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/12/banks-deeply-involved-in-fbi-coordinated-suppression-of-terrorist-occupy-wall-street.html>
If you had any doubts of the veracity of former IMF chief economist
Simon Johnson's depiction of the financial crisis as a "quiet coup," a
pre-Christmas release of FBI documents should put them to rest. While I
linked to a discussion of the results of the Partnership for Civil
Justice's FOIA of FBI materials on Occupy Wall Street, I was remiss in
not writing them up earlier. Both the Partnership for Civil Justice
<http://www.justiceonline.org/commentary/fbi-files-ows.html> and Naomi
Wolf at the Guardian
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/dec/29/fbi-coordinated-crackdown-occupy>
(hat tip Scott A) provide good overviews. The PCJ also published the FBI
documents it obtained
<http://www.justiceonline.org/commentary/fbi-files-ows.html#documents>.
If you've been following the story of the official response to Occupy
Wall Street, it was apparent that the 17 city paramilitary crackdown was
coordinated; it came out later that the Department of Homeland Security
was the nexus of that operation. The deep FBI involvement is a new and
ugly addition to this picture. Several impressions emerge from reading
the summaries and dipping into the FBI documents:
*The FBI deemed OWS to be a terrorist organization and went into
"guilty until proven innocent" mode*. Many of the FBI descriptions
of possible OWS actions or those of affiliated organizations like
Adbusters consistently look to have taken the most inflammatory
snippets and presented them out of context.
The FBI also seems to believe that there is no such thing as
peaceful protest, that any non-violent activity has the potential to
turn violent and therefore should be treated as violent. One
document to corporate "clients" warned:
Even seemingly peaceful rallies can spur violent activity or be
met with resistance by security forces. Bystanders may be
arrested or harmed by security forces using water cannons, tear
gas or other measures to control crowds.
*The banks were deeply involved in the effort to put down OWS*. The
executive director of the PCJ stated, "These documents also show
these federal agencies functioning as a de facto intelligence arm of
Wall Street and Corporate America." Naomi Wolf adds:
The documents, released after long delay in the week between
Christmas and New Year, show a nationwide meta-plot unfolding in
city after city in an Orwellian world: six American universities
are sites where campus police funneled information about
students involved with OWS to the FBI, with the administrations'
knowledge (p51); banks sat down with FBI officials to pool
information about OWS protesters harvested by private security;
plans to crush Occupy events, planned for a month down the road,
were made by the FBI -- and offered to the representatives of
the same organizations that the protests would target; and even
threats of the assassination of OWS leaders by sniper fire -- by
whom? Where? -- now remain redacted and undisclosed to those
American citizens in danger, contrary to standard FBI practice
to inform the person concerned when there is a threat against a
political leader (p61).
More details from the PCJ summary:
As early as August 19, 2011, the FBI in New York was meeting
with the New York Stock Exchange to discuss the Occupy Wall
Street protests that wouldn't start for another month. By
September, prior to the start of the OWS, the FBI was notifying
businesses that they might be the focus of an OWS protest...
Documents released show coordination between the FBI, Department
of Homeland Security and corporate America. They include a
report by the Domestic Security Alliance Council (DSAC),
described by the federal government as "a strategic partnership
between the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security and the
private sector." The DSAC report shows the nature of secret
collaboration between American intelligence agencies and their
corporate clients -- the document contains a "handling notice"
that the information is "meant for use primarily within the
corporate security community. Such messages shall not be
released in either written or oral form to the media, the
general public or other personnel..."....DSAC issued several
tips to its corporate clients on "civil unrest" which it defines
as ranging from "small, organized rallies to large-scale
demonstrations and rioting."...
The Federal Reserve in Richmond appears to have had personnel
surveilling OWS planning. They were in contact with the FBI in
Richmond to "pass on information regarding the movement known as
occupy Wall Street." There were repeated communications "to pass
on updates of the events and decisions made during the small
rallies and the following information received from the Capital
Police Intelligence Unit through JTTF (Joint Terrorism Task
Force)."...
The Jackson, Mississippi division of the FBI attended a meeting
of the Bank Security Group in Biloxi, MS with multiple private
banks and the Biloxi Police Department, in which they discussed
an announced protest for "National Bad Bank Sit-In-Day" on
December 7, 2011.
*As a result, many of the perceptions of threats were paranoid*. The
FBI's search for Communists in woodpiles Occupiers in midsized and
small cities is obvious ovekill. And mind you, this is the same FBI
that is nowhere to be found in investigating crisis-related big bank
fraud. An individual "leading" Occupy Tampa was tracked when he went
to Gainesville. Anchorage, Alaska, Denver, Colorado, Birmingham,
Alabama, Jackson, Mississippi, Memphis, Tennessee, and Green Bay,
Wisconsin all had Occupy-related briefings and FBI activity.
The rationale for this overkill was that OWS was a terrorist threat.
That's a striking contrast with the media depiction of the movement when
it was in its encampment phase as a bunch of directionless hippies with
no message. But the FBI response highlights how anything other than
corporate or otherwise officially sanctioned assembly is no longer
permitted in America. The main objection to OWS really isn't violence,
even though that serves as the excuse for the official crackdown. It was
that it would be inconvenient and embarrassing to Important
Organizations and People. Now I have to tell you as a resident of New
York City, we are subject to inconvenient things on a regular basis. I'd
have a lot less reason to take exception to the eviction of OWS if the
officialdom was evenhanded about making the city efficient and keeping
the streets clear by getting rid of (for starters) all parades, all
street fairs, the marathon, and all Presidential visits (well maybe he
can make a minimally invasive stop, say by going down the FDR to the UN
and staying in those environs).
Wolf draws the ugly conclusion:
Jason Leopold, at Truthout.org, who has sought similar documents for
more than a year, reported that the FBI falsely asserted in response
to his own FOIA requests that no documents related to its
infiltration of Occupy Wall Street existed at all. But the release
may be strategic: if you are an Occupy activist and see how your
information is being sent to terrorism task forces and fusion
centers, not to mention the "longterm plans" of some redacted group
to shoot you, this document is quite the deterrent.
There is a new twist: the merger of the private sector, DHS and the
FBI means that any of us can become WikiLeaks, a point that Julian
Assange was trying to make in explaining the argument behind his
recent book. The fusion of the tracking of money and the suppression
of dissent means that a huge area of vulnerability in civil society
-- people's income streams and financial records -- is now firmly in
the hands of the banks, which are, in turn, now in the business of
tracking your dissent.
Assange has suggested a partial solution: the widespread use of
encryption <http://cryptome.org/2012/12/assange-crypto-arms.htm>. The
problem with using encryption now is that it's like waving a red flag in
front of the NSA and asking them to take interest in you. But if a
meaningful percentage of the population, say as many as 3%, were to
start using it for most of their communications as part of a large-scale
plan, it would throw a wrench into the system. The officialdom would be
presented with an unduly large list of parties of interest, most of whom
by design would be uninteresting from a threat/intelligence perspective.
And if this sort of thing were to take place, anyone who thought they
might be objects of interest for the wrong reasons, as in they were
members of Occupy, could also take up encrypting their messages for fun
and sport.
The peculiar part of this overreaction is it says that banks and
government officials see peaceful protests as a threat to their hold on
power. It's odd that they see their position as precarious, unless they
have convinced themselves of their vulnerability as an excuse for
clamping down even harder on the rest of us.
Topics: Banana republic
<http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/category/banana-republic>, Banking
industry <http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/category/banking-industry>,
Income disparity
<http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/category/income-disparity>, Legal
<http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/category/legal>, Politics
<http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/category/politics>, Social policy
<http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/category/social-policy>, Social values
<http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/category/social-values>, The destruction
of the middle class
<http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/category/the-destruction-of-the-middle-class>
Email This Post
<http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/12/banks-deeply-involved-in-fbi-coordinated-suppression-of-terrorist-occupy-wall-street.html/email/>
Email This Post
<http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/12/banks-deeply-involved-in-fbi-coordinated-suppression-of-terrorist-occupy-wall-street.html/email/>
Posted by Yves Smith at 3:24 am
<http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/12/banks-deeply-involved-in-fbi-coordinated-suppression-of-terrorist-occupy-wall-street.html>
No Comments ยป
<http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/12/banks-deeply-involved-in-fbi-coordinated-suppression-of-terrorist-occupy-wall-street.html#respond>
Links to this post
<http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/12/banks-deeply-involved-in-fbi-coordinated-suppression-of-terrorist-occupy-wall-street.html#comments>
Read more at
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2012/12/banks-deeply-involved-in-fbi-coordinated-suppression-of-terrorist-occupy-wall-street.html#ku6KguAzFZt6cUGw.99
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20121231/5028a21a/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 1065 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20121231/5028a21a/attachment.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
For all other list information and functions, see:
http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
http://www.igcaucus.org/
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list