[governance] Values vs. Interests in IG

[michael gurstein]

I think now that the smoke from Dubai is starting to clear a little, perhaps
it would be a good idea for some of the fog to lift as well.

 

It seems to me that basic to some of the broad base of confusion(s) which
seemingly were at play in Dubai (and certainly were pervasive for those who
weren't there on the ground) is a fundamental (and to a very considerable
degree--manufactured) confusion between "interests" and "values". 

 

The quote (variously attributed to von Clausewitz, Palmerston and Anon) that
"States don't have friends, they have interests", probably should be updated
in the context of a (Facebook et al) broad redefinition of the nature of
"friends"--to the phrase "States don't have values, they have interests"..

 

To me, that pretty much sums up the posing and play acting that went on in
Dubai and particularly frames a useful (i.e. fog free) understanding of the
outcome.  Clearly (to my mind at least) the US and others in the (Internet)
Freedom League were promoting fairly specific commercial/national
"interests" (security, trade, capital and revenue flows, profits, tax
regimes etc.etc.)  under the broad guise of Internet Freedom/Hands off the
Internet.  To my mind nothing particularly surprising about that (the
obverse at least for me would have been the surprise).  

 

Equally of course, the guys in the black hats on the other side were
pursuing national "interests" --security, trade, capital and revenue flows,
profits, tax regimes etc.etc.--but as seen by and supportive of their
team/errr side/errr coalition of the signers... nothing surprising about
this either, and again one would be surprised if it wasn't thus. 

 

However, what is surprising is the way in which the (Internet) Freedom
League was able to frame the discussion (they have been reading their
Lakoff) so decisively as being one of (their) "good" values vs. the others
"bad" interests!

 

Where this gets even more surprising and foggy is why the technical
community and civil society chose to take sides in this arena rather than
siding for the Internet (and the "values" that both, but particularly the
technical community so vigourly and widely have been espousing).  

 

Rather than for example, arguing for the Internet as a global public good
and for the development of arrangements and mechanisms to ensure the
continuity and development of the Internet in the global public interest,
for whatever reason they (both the technical community and CS) chose to get
lost in the fog of battle and accept the public declarations of the purity
of the "values" of one side, over the rather inept if rather more honest
declarations of "Interests" (in WCIT outcomes and ultimately in the
operation of the Internet) by the other side.  (The role of the ITU in all
this as a slightly disingenuous "honest broker" is to my mind largely beside
the point in this follow on discussion.)

 

But now that the smoke is clearing and hopefully for some at least, the fog
is lifting there is now a very significant role for the technical community
and CS (in their respective roles and hopefully as a united coalition of
coalitions) to articulate and lead the fight for a vision of how the
Internet can function as a global public good (as opposed to a battlefield
of multiple private interests) and what the governance structure (or
process) for such a beast might look like.

 

Mike

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20121218/21096693/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t