[governance] [] US, UK and Canada refuse to sign UN's internet treaty

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

The general agreement has not been to try and define it beyond mail that a significant percentage of an isp's users did not request and indicate this by clicking on a report spam button to forward the email to their providers spam filter analysis systems.

--srs (iPad)

On 17-Dec-2012, at 23:00, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:

> 
> On 15 Dec 2012, at 13:04, Roland Perry wrote:
> 
>> The anti-spam industry, and several privacy laws worldwide, have established beyond doubt what 'Unsolicited bulk communications' means for over a decade. There's no need to start new hares running.
> 
> 
> Exactly where are these well established definitions?
> Which ITU treaty or ITU standard defines what "Unsolicited bulk communications"  means?
> 
> And I have not the faintest idea what you mean when you speak of 'hares running.' 
> 
> avri
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
> 
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/
> 
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t