[governance] Internet humbles UN telecoms agency

[Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch]

Milton,

only in appearance. The parties interested in this routing-related clause in the ITRs are concerned that they cannot know exactly where the traffic between two POTS numbers goes, given the use of not only IP networks but also the Internet for routing calls.

The interest comes both from the commercial side (charging, revenue share conservation, etc.) and from law-enforcement origins, in turn related to another vexing question the ITRs can't cover correctly, the traceability of a telephone call's origin.

A further branching out of this problem is "number abuse" which has been discussed in depth by Geoff Huston.

Alejandro Pisanty

! !! !!! !!!!
NEW PHONE NUMBER - NUEVO NÚMERO DE TELÉFONO



+52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD

+525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO

SMS +525541444475
     Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
UNAM, Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico

Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .

________________________________________
Desde: Milton L Mueller [mueller at syr.edu]
Enviado el: viernes, 14 de diciembre de 2012 11:36
Hasta: McTim; governance at lists.igcaucus.org
CC: Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch; Declan McCullagh
Asunto: RE: [governance] Internet humbles UN telecoms agency

This applies to circuit-switched telecoms, not Internet.

> -----Original Message-----
> 1/7 1.4 In cases where one or more international routes have been
> established by agreement between authorized operating agencies and where
> traffic is diverted unilaterally by the authorized operating agency of
> origin to an international route which has not been agreed with the
> authorized operating agency of destination, the terminal shares payable
> to the authorized operating agency of destination shall be the same as
> would have been due to it had the traffic been routed over the agreed
> primary route, and the transit costs are borne by the authorized
> operating agency of origin, unless the authorized operating agency of
> destination is prepared to agree to a different share.
> 1/8 1.5 In cases where traffic is routed via a transit point without
> authorization and/or agreement to the transit share, the transit
> authorized operating agency has the right to set the level of the
> transit share to be included in the international accounts.
>



-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t