[governance] Another conflict of interest at ICANN : SAD !!

[Adam Peake]

Are you suggesting the ombudsman would favor the organization over the
complainant?

Adam




On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Norbert Bollow <nb at bollow.ch> wrote:
> McTim <dogwallah at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro
>> <salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I don't think your statement about "agreeing to disagree" grasps
>> >> the situation well.
>> >>
>> >> Each man has the right to his or her opinion.
>>
>> Correct, but no one has the right to their own facts!
>
> And this is doubly true when, as in the present situation, it concerns
> an accusation that damages the reputation of individuals and/or an
> organisation.
>
> Greetings,
> Norbert
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t