[governance] IGC: WCIT process - Open Letter to ITU: IRP Coalition as signatory?

[Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch]

Bill,

further, as mentioned earlier, they are not hands-off - assuming that is at best disingenuous. And, there seem to be traces of their offices' computers in the UAE et al. proposal falsely labelled as "compromise."

National delegations and sector members must also be called to associate themselves with the statement and, whether they do or not, act according to the parts of it they believe in.

Yours,

Alejandro Pisanty


! !! !!! !!!!
NEW PHONE NUMBER - NUEVO NÚMERO DE TELÉFONO



+52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD

+525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO

SMS +525541444475
     Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
UNAM, Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico

Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .

________________________________
Desde: governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org [governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org] en nombre de William Drake [william.drake at uzh.ch]
Enviado el: domingo, 09 de diciembre de 2012 21:06
Hasta: governance at lists.igcaucus.org; Louis Pouzin (well)
CC: Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro
Asunto: Re: [governance] IGC: WCIT process - Open Letter to ITU: IRP Coalition as signatory?

Hi

While Louis is of course right that it's member states who vote, Toure is expected to put forward a "compromise text" that may become the focal point of discussion, and  Al-Ghanim runs the discussion and plays the usual role of cajoling members to alter or withdraw proposals in the spirit of compromise so the process may move forward etc.  Moreover, both may bring it to the attention of the delegations. So I don't think the letter is misdirected at all.

Best,

Bill

On Dec 10, 2012, at 3:35 AM, Louis Pouzin (well) wrote:

Hi,

This letter is adressed to Secretary General Touré and WCIT-12 Chairman Al-Ghanim, neither of them being institutionally mandated to decide about the provisions proposed by CS.

This may stem from a common misperception of ITU structures. Touré and Al-Ghanim are neither ITU CEO nor Chair. Decision power belongs to 193 ITU members. It would be logical that the CS letter did ask Touré and Al-Ghanim to relay to ITU members CS complaints and proposals.

Louis
- - -

On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro <salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com<mailto:salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com>> wrote:
Dear IGC,

If there is enough support from the IGC to support the open letter to the ITU, we could add the IGC to the list.

See Marianne's email below to the IRP Coalition.

Kind Regards,
Sala
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
    governance at lists.igcaucus.org<mailto:governance at lists.igcaucus.org>
To be removed from the list, visit:
    http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
    http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
    http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20121210/ec71fd78/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t