[governance] Multi-stakeholder model, evolution and revolution

Andrea Glorioso andrea at digitalpolicy.it
Tue Dec 4 17:29:57 EST 2012


Dear all,

John Curran wrote recently on this list:

" I harbor a concern that incremental change may be the only type of change
that open multistakeholder deliberations can actually support, as the
discussions of more revolutionary changes seem to inevitably jump to more
authoritarian questions such as "who is charge", "who can approve this",
etc. This is a topic worth thinking about in general about MS governance
processes."

Is there any serious research analyzing the extent to which
multi-stakeholder processes favour evolutionary vs revolutionary decisions
/ changes, in the Internet world or elsewhere?

Thanks,

Andrea
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20121204/ffb7281f/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


More information about the Governance mailing list