[governance] NTIA statement on IP addressing - broadly supportive of RIRs

[McTim]

On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Louis Pouzin (well) <pouzin at well.com> wrote:
> Last parag reads:
>
> «Consistent with the policies developed through the current multistakeholder
> model, the USG believes that all IP numbers are allocated for use on a needs
> basis and should be returned to the numbering pool when no longer needed.»
>
> The USG "believes", that's all. Others may believe differently.
> "when no longer needed" (lol), there will always be some needs somewhere, as
> transfer/sale is not prohibited.


some places allow it, some do not....YMMV.


-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t