[governance] Big Porn v. Big Web Ruling Could Spell Trouble for ICANN / was Re: new gTLDs

[Robert Pollard]

Salanieta

Thanks for these interesting links. I'm re-posting your message with a new
subject line, as the issue would seem to deserve a separate thread from
"new gTLDs".

Although the suit may have some implications for new gTLDs, many of the
allegations re antitrust issues re the .xxx tld are based on the the
particular history of the establishment of .xxx and the actions of ICM
Registry, LLC in obtaining control of it

Robert


On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro <
salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com> wrote:

http://www.law.com/jsp/lawtechnologynews/PubArticleLTN.jsp?id=1202567792748
>
> http://pdfserver.amlaw.com/tal/icann.pdf
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20120820/1abe2128/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t