[governance] Tangential (On Exceptionalism Wikileaks) America's vassal acts decisively and illegally

[Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch]

Hi,

not to speak of the fact that the mechanisms we are building are specific to the problems at hand (domain names, phishing, mail abuse, etc.) and it's a really long shot to think of one oversight board comprehensive enough to deal with them all.


Yours,

Alejandro Pisanty


! !! !!! !!!!
NEW PHONE NUMBER - NUEVO NÚMERO DE TELÉFONO



+52-1-5541444475 FROM ABROAD

+525541444475 DESDE MÉXICO

SMS +525541444475
     Dr. Alejandro Pisanty
UNAM, Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico

Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty
Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http://www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614
Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty
---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org
.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .

________________________________
Desde: governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org [governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org] en nombre de Kerry Brown [kerry at kdbsystems.com]
Enviado el: lunes, 20 de agosto de 2012 10:34
Hasta: governance at lists.igcaucus.org; McTim
Asunto: RE: [governance] Tangential (On Exceptionalism Wikileaks) America's vassal acts decisively and illegally

Best statement I’ve heard yet in this ongoing, neverending debate.

“There is an even clearer alternative, that of NO oversight by governments.”

Why are we as civil participants advocating for any government control of the Internet. An international board of representatives of all stakeholders with none having any more power than any other is the preferred option. We are on the way to that already. Why would we want to change this path?

Kerry Brown

From: governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org [mailto:governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org] On Behalf Of McTim
Sent: August-20-12 8:20 AM
To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org; parminder
Subject: Re: [governance] Tangential (On Exceptionalism Wikileaks) America's vassal acts decisively and illegally


On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 9:14 AM, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net<mailto:parminder at itforchange.net>> wrote:

<snip>

The alternative is clear;


There is an even clearer alternative, that of NO oversight by governments.

Since we are CS, why would we insist on having gov'ts take on this role when we can do it ourselves (as a "free--floating" ICANN run by an international BoD)?

Not only is this more desirable IMHO, but actually something that might be achieved.

--
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20120820/3c062e4d/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t