[governance] India's communications minister - root server misunderstanding (still...)

[Ian Peter]

Siva wrote

³. Even a pretension to add / relocate one or two servers would lay to rest
most of the criticism about the unilateral control of the root, read
(conveniently by those who archestrate anti-Internet propaganda), unilateral
control of the Internet.²

No it wouldn¹t. Until such time as the US authority to unilaterally give
final approval to changes to the root zone is removed, the criticism will
remain.

Ian Peter



From: Sivasubramanian M <isolatedn at gmail.com>
Reply-To: <governance at lists.igcaucus.org>, Sivasubramanian M
<isolatedn at gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 01:04:06 +0530
To: <governance at lists.igcaucus.org>, "Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch"
<apisan at unam.mx>
Cc: Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp>
Subject: RE: [governance] India's communications minister - root server
misunderstanding (still...)


The root server infrastructure, despite its harmless functions, occupy a
recurrent space in Internet Governance debates, their functions understood,
or otherwise, for its symbolic value.

I have always wondered if it wouldn't be wiser for United States to make a
gesture of assurance to the rest of the world by exploring the technical
feasibility of locating a few more elsewhere. The Wikipedia article on Root
Name Server says that "The choice of 13 nameservers was made because of
limitations in the original DNS specification" with a 'why?' asking for
citation. Assuming that there is a limitation, could there be other possible
gesturegs?  Fully Qualified Mirrors?  Or, could there be an extraordinary
gesture of one of the Universities retaining a Fully Connected Mirror in
their premises and relocate the Root Server to an Institution such as the
Indian Institute of Technology with transition support for 3 to 5 years? 
Or, would Verisign Inc do the same to make this extraordinary gesture by
shifting the root server to Verisign India or Verisign Africa? The relocated
servers would be under the present root server infrastructure any way.

It may not be easy, it could be technically complex, and possibly expensive.
Even a pretension to add / relocate one or two servers would lay to rest
most of the criticism about the unilateral control of the root, read
(conveniently by those who archestrate anti-Internet propaganda), unilateral
control of the Internet.

Sent from Turiya MID
http://turiya.mobi

On Aug 2, 2012 9:17 PM, "Sivasubramanian M" <isolatedn at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Dear Alejandro,
> 
> Many of these 'misunderstandings' indicate that our policy makers, as also,
> those in many other countries are misled by anti-Internet lobby groups, in
> this case this misunderstanding is a reflection of what has been fed by
> "Advisors" who haven't worried about the blatant inaccuracy of the
> misinformation planted at the ministerial level.
> 
> The situation you have described about the Kenya IGF where the IBSA proposal
> caused discomfort, is another example of wrong advice and strong influences at
> junior level which sometimes causes people of higher administrative and/or
> ministerial responsibility to be criticized. In this Kenya and some other
> instances, it could have been a situation of a lobbyist with an NGO facade
> earning enough trust to prepare a whole draft in the name of the country. Such
> situations would indeed change with learned and responsible good people within
> the administration paying attention to the inner dynamics and paying attention
> to every word that gets published / spoken in the name of the country.
> 
> Unfortunately, what has so far surfaced in the name of India does not truly
> reflect the Indian mind, which is far more sensible and evolved.
> 
> I would strongly agree with an earlier comment on this thread that the
> Internet Community has not done enough to disseminate fundamental information
> on the workings of something as new as the Internet on which not many policy
> makers could be expected to be experts without a focussed program.  While this
> need is left unfilled by the Internet Community, negative forces are busy with
> plenty of misinformation by proximity.
> 
> Sent from Turiya MID
> http://turiya.mobi
> 
> On Aug 2, 2012 11:03 AM, "Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Baruch" <apisan at unam.mx>
> wrote:


____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20120803/872e00ab/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t