[governance] ICANNLeaks - Losing Trust to Maintain the Secrecy

[Imran Ahmed Shah]

According to the latest information posted by ICANN, the Application
System will not open tomorrow.
 http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/announcements-and-media/announcement-16apr12-en
  “We will
provide an update on the timing of the reopening no later than Friday, 20 April at 23.59 UTC.”, Akram
Atallah, COO

>________________________________
> From: Imran Ahmed Shah <ias_pk at yahoo.com>
>To: "governance at lists.igcaucus.org" <governance at lists.igcaucus.org> 
>Cc: "Imran @IGFPak.org" <imran at igfpak.org> 
>Sent: Tuesday, 17 April 2012, 16:29
>Subject: [governance] ICANNLeaks - Loosing Trust to Maintain the Secrecy
>  
>
>Dear
All,
>Security, Stability and Resiliency of the Internet layers was the prime responsibility of the ICANN, but the organization
couldn't protect/ secure its latest online application submission system of new
gTLDs (TAS). Would it be fair to say the best practices were not followed to
design the system which was built to keep the information secure, confidential
and protected. This
application supported the collection of 850+ applications and over $150m funds.
> 
>ICANN
has been informed about this the glitch on 19th but ICANN did not taken it
seriously, decision making took about 23 days. 
>ICANN took its TAS Application
offline on 12th April which was the last date when it has to be closed
automatically. ICANN has its plan to reopen this TAS system to the public that
mean Expansion the 90days window by extension of closing
date.
> "We have learned of a possible glitch in the TLD application system software that has allowed a limited number of users to view some other users' file names and user names in certain scenarios."
> 
>Technically it was necessary to use the secure method
and variables should not be displayed in the URL. According to the policy the
information of the applicants will not be disclosed however, the applicant name
and the applied for string has to publically announced at a later stage. Many of them may have lost their
secrecy& confidentiality. It is next to impossible to discover that who is
the beneficiary and who is the looser? However, it will raise the conflicts
and bidding values.
>In
short ICANN has lost its trust for maintaining the confidentiality, Integrity and Information Security. ICANN has to re-define its policy or call public comments that how to deal with this scenario. 
> 
>Thanks
> 
>Imran Ahmed Shah
>.
> 
>____________________________________________________________
>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>    governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>To be removed from the list, visit:
>    http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
>For all other list information and functions, see:
>    http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>    http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
>Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20120417/65a16469/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t