[governance] StratforLeaks: Google Ideas Director Involved in ‘Regime Change’

[parminder]

http://english.al-akhbar.com/content/stratforleaks-google-ideas-director-involved-%E2%80%98regime-change%E2%80%99

This is a most astonishing piece of news forwarded by Riaz, even for 
someone like me who has a natural suspicion of Internet powers (as of 
all powers)..... Google actually has an almost official 'regime change' 
agenda which works closely with the more famous US 'regime change' 
proclivities.

Following this news item I did some, well, sorry to say, 'googling' to 
find another new item where google chief (or, ex chief) proffers that 
the 'Iranian bomb' was perhaps an issue they, meaning google, can take 
up. (No today isnt April 1st.)

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/b8e8b560-a84a-11e0-9f50-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1oMmNLULH

Some questions are being raised about such activity by Google, but, 
interesting, mostly about what if is works "in conflict with the foreign 
policy of the US". Amusing! Of course only the rich can afford to 
discuss security and foreign policy concerns; the less fortunate should 
take what is served to them.

      "Joseph Nye, the Harvard professor who coined the phrase “soft
    power”, told The Washington Post in the lead-up to the Dublin
    meeting that Google’s entry into the arena “could be problematic –
    especially if it is perceived to be in conflict with the foreign
    policy of the United States” "


Earlier, there has been this news about an understanding of the US 
National Security Agency with Google at

http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2012/03/doj-asks-court-to-keep-secret-any-partnership-between-google-nsa.html

US gov seem to have similar arrangements with other Internet biggies 
like Facebook, Twitter etc, which gives it privileged access to 
information held by them, and other kinds of leveraged that can be 
exercised by them. This is hardly surprising since these are all US 
companies and they need to comply with the requirements of US law, and 
cooperate with US gov on furthering US interests.

And still many people want developing countries to not have any security 
concerns vis a vis the unipolar control of the US over much of the core 
of the Internet, whether in form of CIRs or the 'operations room' of the 
major Internet companies that together constitute most of the Internet 
today. This position is difficult to sell to even the most well meaning 
developing country government guy. And why only government, also to a 
southern civil society person, because security relates to real people 
and stark issues of their lives. (Think Afghanistan vis a vis big powers 
driving arbitrary regime changes!)

Parminder

On Thursday 15 March 2012 01:28 PM, Riaz K Tayob wrote:
>
>
>   StratforLeaks: Google Ideas Director Involved in ‘Regime Change’
>
> By: Yazan al-Saadi <http://english.al-akhbar.com/author/yazan-al-saadi>
>
> Published Wednesday, March 14, 2012
>
> Top Google execs, including the company’s CEO and one of Barack 
> Obama’s major presidential campaign donors Eric Schmidt, informed the 
> intelligence agency Stratfor about Google’s activities and internal 
> communication regarding “regime change” in the Middle East, according 
> to Stratfor emails released by WikiLeaks and obtained by Al-Akhbar. 
> The other source cited was Google’s director for security and safety 
> Marty Lev.
>
> The briefings mainly focused on the movements of Jared Cohen, 
> currently the director of Google Ideas, a “think/do-tank” billed as a 
> vehicle for spreading American-style liberal democracy. Cohen was also 
> a former member of US Secretary of State’s Policy Planning Staff and 
> former advisor to Condoleezza Rice and Hillary Clinton.
>
> Email exchanges, starting February 2011, suggest that Google execs 
> were suspicious that Cohen was coordinating his moves with the White 
> House and cut Cohen’s mission short at times for fear he was taking 
> too many risks. Stratfor’s vice-president of counter-terrorism Fred 
> Burton, who seemed opposed to Google’s alleged covert role in 
> “foaming” uprisings, describes Cohen as a “loose Cannon” whose killing 
> or kidnapping “might be the best thing to happen” to expose Google.
>
> *The Cohen Conspiracy*
>
> Stratfor’s spotlight on Cohen began on 9 February 2012 after Burton 
> forwarded to the secure email list a Foreign Policy article discussing 
> Cohen’s move from the State Department to Google Ideas. With this 
> article, Burton noted that Cohen had dinner in Cairo with Wael Ghonim 
> on January 27, 2011 just hours before the Egyptian Google Executive 
> was famously picked up by Egypt’s State Security. (doc-id 1122191 
> <http://english.al-akhbar.com/gi-files/1122191egypt-google-suggest-you-read>)
>
> On the same day, Stratfor’s staff make reference to a Huffington Post 
> article which highlighted Cohen’s role in “delaying the scheduled 
> maintenance on Twitter so the Iranian revolution could keep going” and 
> a Foreign Policy article that noted that Cohen “was a Rhodes scholar, 
> spent time in Iran, [and] hung out in Iraq during the war…”. These 
> casual discovers further perked Stratfor’s curiosity about Cohen. 
> (doc-id 1629270 <http://english.al-akhbar.com/gi-files/1629270more-cohen>)
>
> The following day, Burton forwarded a message to the secure email list 
> from “a very good Google source” who claimed that Cohen “[was] off to 
> Gaza next week”. Burton added, “Cohen, a Jew, is bound to get himself 
> whacked….Google is not clear if Cohen is operating [with a] State Dept 
> [or] WH [White House] license, or [is] a hippie activist.”
>
> Korena Zucha, another senior analyst on the list, queried, “Why hasn’t 
> Google cut ties to Cohen yet? Or is Cohen’s activity being endorsed by 
> those higher up in the [company] than your contact?”
>
> In turn, Burton replied, “Cohen’s rabbi is Eric Schmidt and Obama 
> lackey. My source is trying to find out if the billionaire owners are 
> backing Cohen’s efforts for regime change.” (doc-id 1111729 
> <http://english.al-akhbar.com/gi-files/1111729goggle-shitstorm-moving-gaza-internal-use-only>)
>
> Later on, Burton forwarded information from the “Google source” of 
> Cohen’s links in establishing Movements.org 
> <http://www.movements.org/>. The source added, “A site created to help 
> online organization of groups and individuals to move democracy in 
> stubborn nations. Funded through public-private partnerships.” Burton 
> pointed out that the US State Department is the organization’s public 
> sponsor.” (doc-id 1118344 
> <http://english.al-akhbar.com/gi-files/1118344googles-cohen-activist-role>)
>
> Indeed, the State Department, partnering with a number of 
> corporations, was the main sponsor for the 2008 inaugural Alliance of 
> Youth Movements summit in New York City that subsequently established 
> Movements.org. Hillary Clinton endorsed the organization and presented 
> a video message during the second summit held in Mexico City a year 
> later.
>
> On 11 February, Burton wrote to the secure email list that Cohen was 
> still planning to head to Gaza. He added, “The dude is a loose 
> can[n]on. GOOGLE is trying to stop his entry into Gaza now because the 
> dude is like scorched earth. It’s unclear to GOOGLE if he’s driving 
> without a license, but GOOGLE believes he’s on a specific mission of 
> “regime change” on the part of leftist fools inside the WH who are 
> using him for their agendas.” (doc-id 1113596 
> <http://english.al-akhbar.com/gi-files/1113596movementsorg-founder-cohen>)
>
> Throughout this day, the idea proposed by Burton, and seemingly felt 
> by his Google contacts as well, of Cohen and the White House’s 
> involvement in the uprisings was actively discussed among the 
> analysts, especially in regards to who would be targeted next. (doc-id 
> 1113965 
> <http://english.al-akhbar.com/gi-files/1113965discussion-who-next>)
>
> By Monday, 14 February 2011, Burton shared intelligence with George 
> Friedman, Stratfor’s founder, and Scott Stewart, vice-president of 
> Stratfor’s tactical department, from his source in Google that Cohen 
> was ordered not to go to Gaza. Burton’s Google source further stated, 
> “Also, thinking I [the unnamed source] may be on the right track about 
> him despite his denials [in reference to Cohen working for the White 
> House/State Department].”
>
> When asked to clarify his sources on Cohen, Burton claimed that they 
> were Marty Lev, Google’s director for security and safety, and Eric 
> Schmidt, the current CEO of Google. (doc-id 398679 
> <http://english.al-akhbar.com/gi-files/398679googles-jared-cohen-update>)
>
> A week later, Burton forwarded an internal Google email obtained from 
> a ‘senior Google executive’. This email was seemingly sent by Cohen to 
> the senior Google executive to discuss Cohen’s planned trip in March.
> In it, Cohen wrote, “I wanted to follow-up and get a sense of your 
> latest thinking on the proposed March trip to UAE, Azerbaijan, and 
> Turkey. The purpose of this trip is to exclusively engage the Iranian 
> community to better understand the challenges faced by Iranians as 
> part of one of our Google Ideas groups on repressive societies. Here 
> is what we are thinking: Drive to Azerbaijan/Iranian border and engage 
> the Iranian communities closer to the border (this is important 
> because we need the Azeri Iranian perspective).”
>
> After reading Cohen’s email, Stewart remarked, “Cohen might end up 
> having an accident if he is not careful. This is not child’s play.”
>
> Burton responded, “GOOGLE is getting WH [White House] and State Dept. 
> support and air cover. In reality, they are doing things the CIA 
> cannot do. But, I agree with you. He’s going to get himself kidnapped 
> or killed. Might be the best thing to happen to expose GOOGLE’s covert 
> role in foaming up-risings, to be blunt. The US Gov’t can then disavow 
> knowledge and GOOGLE is left holding the shit bag.” (doc-id 1121800 
> <http://english.al-akhbar.com/gi-files/1121800google-iran-internal-use-only-pls-do-not-forward>)
>
> On 10 March 2011, Burton forwarded another message from his ‘senior 
> Google executive’ source detailing how Cohen was requested not to 
> travel on his proposed trip. The source explained that Google had 
> concerns over Cohen’s “baggage” as a “US State Dept. policy maker, his 
> research and publications on Muslim extremists and youth movements and 
> his presence in Egypt just as the uprising started.”The source also 
> stated that Cohen was recommended to “take a lower profile on this 
> specific trip and let time pass before being visible and associated 
> with people known by their states to be active in challenging 
> repressive societies.” (doc-id 1164190 
> <http://english.al-akhbar.com/gi-files/1164190google-loose-canon-bound-turkey-uae-sensitive-do-not-forward>)
>
> A subsequent message from Burton’s source on 22 March 2011 affirmed 
> that Cohen “heeded the advice not to go to Turkey or UAE for those 
> meetings.” (doc-id 1133861 
> <http://english.al-akhbar.com/gi-files/1133861google-cohen-hosting-terrorists>)
>
> The final email dealing with Cohen was on 30 March 2011.
> Here, Burton forwarded to the alpha (secure) email list a response by 
> his source to Burton’s question of whether Cohen was playing any role 
> in Libya at the time. The source stated, “Not that I’m aware of. He 
> heeded the advice to avoid Turkey and UAE and didn’t go on that trip.” 
> (doc-id 1160182 
> <http://english.al-akhbar.com/gi-files/1160182jared-cohen-google>)
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *Google Ideas: Politicizing Technology*
>
> Certainly, there is more than meets the eye to Cohen and his actions; 
> even his superiors in Google seem to think so.
>
> The belief, chiefly by Burton, that Cohen had seemingly played a role 
> in fermenting the uprisings that toppled Zine el Abidine Ben Ali and 
> Hosni Mubarak underplays, and at times entirely disregards, the 
> ability and agency by local movements in Tunisia and Egypt.
>
> Nevertheless, Google Ideas, which Cohen directs, is a new animal. 
> According to a report 
> <http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/b8e8b560-a84a-11e0-9f50-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1oMmNLULH> 
> by the Financial Times published last July, Google Ideas seems to bond 
> idealistic activist sensibilities with Google’s pursuit for continued 
> global expansion - blurring the lines between business and political 
> action. Schmidt and Cohen dub Google Ideas as a “think/do-tank” that 
> aims to tackle political and diplomatic matters through the use of 
> technology.
>
> The first public event for the think/do-tank, in partnership with the 
> Council on Foreign Relations and the Tribeca Film Festival, was held 
> last June in Dublin. It gathered around 80 ‘former’ extremists, 
> including former Muslim radicals, neo-Nazis, US gang members, and 
> others, in a “Summit Against Violent Extremism”. The announcement 
> <http://googlepublicpolicy.blogspot.com/2011/06/google-ideas-launches-summit-against.html> 
> by Google declared that the summit’s aim is “to initiate a global 
> conversation on how best to prevent young people from becoming 
> radicalised and how to de-radicalise others” and that “the ideas 
> generated at the Dublin summit will be included in a study to be 
> published later in the year.”
>
> One spin off was the creation of the Against Violent Extremism 
> <http://www.againstviolentextremism.org/> group, apparently a network 
> for those who attended the Dublin Summit. Beyond merely networking, 
> the group also advertises certain projects that are in need of 
> funding. Notably, much of the projects pertain to the Middle East, 
> including an “Al-Awlaki Counter-Campaign” - Anwar al-Awlaki, an 
> American citizen of Yemeni origin, was assassinated in September of 
> last year by the US for his alleged al-Qaeda connections.
>
> But the Against Violent Extremism site does not seem to be presently 
> active. The last update for projects in need of funding was made in 
> September and the last announcement regarding the workings of the site 
> was made in October.
>
> More recently, Foreign Policy reported in January that the Brookings 
> Institute, one of the oldest and most influential think-tanks in 
> Washington, DC, named Google Ideas as “the best new think tank 
> <http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2012/01/18/brookings_tops_2011_think_tank_rankings> 
> established in the last 18 months.” Such accolades arguably suggests 
> that Google Ideas is expected to be a major player in the near future.
>
> http://english.al-akhbar.com/content/stratforleaks-google-ideas-director-involved-%E2%80%98regime-change%E2%80%99
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20120402/462a527c/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t