[governance] Announcing the results of the 2012 IGC coordinator elections

[KovenRonald at aol.com]

Dear All --

I didn't vote because i didn't get a very clear idea who the candidates 
were. But I still want to be active in the IGC. I therefore think there should 
be a way to vote, exoressing interest in the IGC, without stating a 
preference for a candidate.

Rather than "none of the above," I suggest there be provision for 
"abstain," which casts aspersions on nobody, while showing attachment to the caucus.

With a couple of notable exceptions, voting isn't a requirement of 
citizenship. And even in countries where voting is required explicitly (Australia, 
Belgium) or implicitly (Italy), one can, after all cast a blank or spoiled 
ballot. 

Best regards, Rony Koven
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20111020/10611243/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t