[governance] Formal IGC response to IBSA proposal ahead of 18-19 Summit?

[Izumi AIZU]

There will be IGF open consultation scheduled sometime in November.
If we could reach good stage to call for a consensus, that will be another
good target.

The next meeting of the CSTD WG on IGF improbement will be taken
place on Oct 31-Nov 2 in Geneva.

We like to make a request to make it more open, allowing "observer" in the room.

So there are more opportunities to come.

izumi


2011/10/11 Jeremy Malcolm <jeremy at ciroap.org>:
> On 11/10/2011, at 1:58 AM, Tracy F. Hackshaw @ Google wrote:
>
> Following on my own informal discussions at the IGF with
> representation from the Brazilian Government and noting the
> willingness of the Brazilians, at least, to discuss, compromise and
> collaborate, I am in support of Marilia's and Parminder's position as
> well as their rationale re: the proposed IGC Response/Statement ...
>
> Then, I don't think we will be able to finish a substantively useful
> statement in time for the IBSA Summit but could only restate the more
> high-level ideas from our enhanced cooperation statement, since our
> collective view has not been much refined since then.  That is OK, because
> it is better to be thoughtful than on time, but if anyone does not wish us
> to miss the opportunity to contribute ahead of the IBSA Summit then please
> help to discuss:
> How to respond to each of these assertions?
>
> There is an institutional gap in managing global Internet processes and
> developing policies for Internet at a global level which needs to be
> addressed.
> This requires a new body (outside of the IGF, ITU, OECD, etc.) to coordinate
> and evolve coherent and integrated global public policies pertaining to the
> Internet.
> If a new body is created, it should be located within the UN system.
> If a new body is created, it should develop and establish international
> public policies on cross-cutting Internet-related global issues.
> If a new body is created, it should oversee the bodies responsible for
> technical and operational functioning of the Internet, including global
> standards setting.
> If a new body is created, it should address developmental issues related to
> the Internet.
> If a new body is created, it should undertake arbitration and dispute
> resolution, where necessary.
> If a new body is created, it should be responsible for crisis management
>
> If a new body is not formed within the UN system, how else should global
> public policies for the Internet be set, in cases that fall outside the
> competence of any global body?
>
> No institutional change, no global norm-setting in areas not covered by
> existing institutions, improved consultation in areas that are.
> Institutional improvements to the IGF, to enable it to produce policy
> options which policy makers (including at the national level) can use.
> Institutional change outside of the UN system, such as a voluntary network
> of policy makers that would consult with all stakeholders.
>
> --
>
> Dr Jeremy Malcolm
> Project Coordinator
> Consumers International
> Kuala Lumpur Office for Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
> Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur,
> Malaysia
> Tel: +60 3 7726 1599
>
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t