[governance] remote paticipation via standardized protocols (was Re: Open consultations)

[Roland Perry]

In message <20110519075934.696A515C0DF at quill.bollow.ch>, at 09:59:34 on 
Thu, 19 May 2011, Norbert Bollow <nb at bollow.ch> writes
>> If things change, other solutions might be preferable, but this one
>> works, now, and we should embrace it.
>
>Wishful thinking and denying that a problem exists does not
>help someone for whom this "solution" does not work (like it
>is the case for me, with a rather ordinary Ubuntu setup with
>Adobe flash installed from the "Canonical partner repository",
>so according to Roland's assertions the "solution" should
>work, but in my actual experience that is not the case.)

What I said was that there were more than two platforms available.

>Wishful thinking and denying that a problem exists also does
>not help to address the fundamental internet governance problem
>that --because of the insufficient emphasis on strictly open
>standards in key communication related areas-- there is strong
>socioeconomic pressure to avoid using e.g. GNU/Linux.

I'm sorry, but I don't think Operating System Wars is anything to do 
with Internet Governance.
-- 
Roland Perry
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t