[governance] Grading Workshops

[Roland Perry]

In message <4DCC2A5D.6020400 at eff.org>, at 11:43:41 on Thu, 12 May 2011, 
Katitza Rodriguez <katitza at eff.org> writes
>I will start reading one by one the over 100 workshops that has been presented to see weather or not the workshops comply with "basic"
>requirements published in the IGF website (gender balance, region, etc):
>
>0 = not at all
>1 =  has made a little effort to satisfy the criteria
>2 = somewhat meets the criteria
>3= fully meets the criteria

Last year the "traffic light chart" had a total of 101 workshop 
proposals:

Access             6
CIR               14
Diversity         11
Openness          29
Security/Privacy  15
Capacity Building  9
Development       15
Emerging Issues    2

Given the changes to the timetabling (and the concept of "feeders") I 
reckon it'll be more difficult this year to reduce the numbers to a 
manageable proportion.
-- 
Roland Perry
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t