[governance] [lack of] Net Neutrality for Mobile Internet in different shapes and forms?
JFC Morfin
jefsey at jefsey.com
Sat Mar 19 14:35:27 EDT 2011
At 11:10 19/03/2011, Roland Perry wrote:
>If you want to watch a TV show at the same resolution as broadcast
>(especially on a wide-screen TV) then it does require 1 Megabit or
>more. That's quite an achievement, actually, because they use 4+
>megabits for standard broadcast quality.
And your eye has 40 slow channels to your brain. The margin left to
better technology is huge. Read my definition back: it does call for
innovation. Neutrality is first for everyone to have the best
avaialble technology. RFC 3869 says (end of page 2): "The principal
thesis of this document is that if commercial funding is the main
source of funding for future Internet research, the future of the
Internet infrastructure could be in trouble. In addition to issues
about which projects are funded, the funding source can also affect
the content of the research, for example, towards or against the
development of open standards, or taking varying degrees of care
about the effect of the developed protocols on the other traffic on
the Internet."
The network neutrality is in trouble. But the solution is not in
managing what commercial funding led to, but in demanding public
funding to at last respond to the IAB. And in heping grassoroots
research. Europe decided not to do so at the WSIS, and to drop the
hopes of developping countries in Tunis, with Martin Boyle
representing us and playing the US card. We must reform that. To
reform that is easy enough: to acknowledge the three areas involved
(operance, governance, adminance) and to disqualify the absentees as
stakeholders. For example, the non-participation of the IETF to the
WSIS is proprely scandalous: this is the real source of the
netneutrality issue. But Brian Carpenter, the Chair at the time,
wrote me the less IETF is involved, the better.
We have a chance now, which is to use the current architectural
evolution, and the IUse tiny community emergence, to change this. But
it will take time and apostoles.
Best
jfc
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
For all other list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
http://www.igcaucus.org/
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list