[governance] [lack of] Net Neutrality for Mobile Internet in different shapes and forms?

[JFC Morfin]

All the discussed engineering is related to network operance tricks 
or rules. Governance is concerned with the architectural laws.

Architecturally, network neutrality is simple to define and test: it 
is when the quality of the end to end relation stays unaffected by 
the change of the operators of the intermediate network elements. 
This is why network neutrality will result from IUse generated 
competition among ISP, permitted by IUI ISP rotation.

This means the day the users' Intelligent Use Interface (IUI) may 
easily rotate ISPs in real time depending of the current 
price/quality ratio - quality incuding routing choices (ex. Echellon 
free). ISPs will start charging by neutrality and quality duration. 
This will be possible in using the NPTv6 solution presented by Fred 
Baker (http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-mrw-nat66-12.txt) 
which is an upsidedown NAT66. It permits hosts to keep the same IPv6 
address and to appear on the network as two or more IPv6 addresses 
possibly at different ISPs.

jfc

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t