[governance] CSTD IX. Conclusions and recommendations

[Norbert Bollow]

Parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> wrote:

> If stakeholders are to be really an active part of policy shaping 
> process (a term used by Bertrand)  it should be obvious that we will 
> need to put our belief in policy related documents that are concrete 
> enough to have influence, but less than binding policies themselves - 
> whether they are advisory notes, recs, reports on specific issues, 
> messages or whatever.

Who are the envisioned users of the "policy related documents"
output of the IFG that you're envisioning?

- members of parliament (in various countries)?

- people working for a government in some kind kind of administrative
  function?

- members of standardization committees working on technical
  standards with relevance to internet governance?

- others?

What are their needs that could possibly be met by IGF-generated
documents?

Greetings,
Norbert
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t