[governance] Re: Revised version of statement on themes for Nairobi

[Jeremy Malcolm]

A consensus call on this statement is now in progress. I just issued
email invitations to vote using our online poll system.  (Incidentally,
this is the first poll in which the polling software has been hosted on
our own Web site.)

If you didn't receive an invitation to vote in the poll, you have two
choices:

(a) you can register at http://www.igcaucus.org (you'll get your poll
invitation within a few hours); or
(b) you can reply on the list instead.

Thanks.

On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 09:37 +0800, Jeremy Malcolm wrote:
> Without wanting to distract attention from Marilia's important threads
> on the CSTD, here is a revised version of the statement on themes for
> Nairobi.  I think we can see the merits of both "open Internet"  and
> "network neutrality", so I think the only way to satisfy everyone is
> to use both phrases, which I now have.  I've also added the fourth
> theme on A2K, since there seems to be a feeling that we should do
> that; I used Ian's more succinct wording which is in line with the
> others.  In case anyone thinks that we should correspondingly
> de-emphasise A2K in the other themes let me know - but I haven't
> touched them for now.
> 
> 
> This can go to a consensus call on the weekend if everyone is happy
> now.
> 
> 
> 1. Open Internet - Network Neutrality on Wired and Mobile Networks
> Open Internet (or Network Neutrality) describes an ideal in which the
> openness of the Internet to the broadest possible range of commercial
> and non-commercial content, applications and services is maintained.
>  An open Internet is one that supports development, promotes Access
> to Knowledge, and resists perpetuating the power of old media and
> telecommunications empires on the new network.
> 
> With the explosion of Internet usage in the developing world mainly
> occurring on mobile networks, it is particularly important to consider
> how the ideal of open Internet will apply in the mobile space.  Should
> different rules apply for mobile and wired Internet networks?  If so,
> how can communications rights and Access to Knowledge be preserved for
> those users, in order to avoid an ongoing information divide?
> 
> In proposing this topic for the Nairobi IGF, we want to particularly
> ensure that it does not shy away from areas of disagreement.  Only by
> including panelists with divergent views on this topic can the very
> real and practical Internet governance disputes in this area
> be adequately and productively aired.
> 
> 2. Cross border Issues
> One of the oldest and thorniest issues for Internet governance
> concerns the cross-border effects of national laws, policies,
> enforcement practices, and the actions of intermediaries, on those who
> have had no representation in the making of those laws, policies,
> etc.  Current examples include actions taken by governments and
> intermediaries against Wikileaks, and the “seizure” of domain names
> alleged to be connected with content piracy.
> 
> The process towards enhanced cooperation on Internet policy issues
> could lead to new proposals that would address some of these
> cross-border anomalies and deficits.  But at this stage of that
> process, there is little shared understanding of the approach that
> should be taken.  This session will look at the philosophical
> underpinnings and foundations that need to emerge in a world where
> something like the Internet transcends boundaries and
> national jurisdictions.  Insights produced through this session may
> feed into the enhanced coperation process.
> 
> Once again, it will be important for discussion of this topic to
> involve stakeholders with diverging views, discussing concrete issues
> that demand eventual resolution.
> 
> 3. Development agenda for Internet governance
> Internet governance is not a neutral activity. All Internet governance
> decisions have implications for development, though in some cases
> these implications may be less obvious than in others, and they are
> easily overlooked.
> 
> An example is the way in which decisions about such diverse issues as
> new global top level domains (gTLDs), Unicode, IP enforcement,
> filtering and censorship, may have an adverse and sometimes unforeseen
> impact on Access to Knowledge in the developing world.
> 
> We propose a main session theme on developing a development agenda for
> Internet governance, building on the similar session in Vilnius.  This
> session will help to draw out areas of Internet governance which have
> significant impacts on development, and to suggest how development
> concerns can be mainstreamed in Internet governance institutions that
> have responsibility in these areas.
> 
> 
> 4. Access to knowledge
> Access to knowledge is part of the great promise of the Internet in
> aiding development, education and culture both within and between
> countries.
> 
> However, new  international standards require countries to increase
> the level and  territorial extent of intellectual property rights.
> This trend has  developmental impacts, as countries become less free
> to support open platforms  for learning, innovating, sharing and
> producing, while being required to raise  the amount spent on
> knowledge-based inputs. 
> 
> Rather than substantive law harmonization, international IP
> norm-setting is  now promoting an enforcement agenda, an increasingly
> punitive response to  counterfeiting and piracy now being discussed in
> many national and  international institutions. Often this puts
>  Internet Service Providers in the position of an “Internet police”,
> with the role to oversight  internet users. 
> 
> Governance  of knowledge and Internet governance become deeply
> intertwined in the context  of an information society. The debate of
> this theme in a multistakeholder  forum, such as the IGF, would help
> to reach a more round understanding about  the impacts of this agenda
> on  issues such as access to knowledge, and the ability to innovate
> online. 
> -- 
> Jeremy Malcolm
> Project Coordinator
> Consumers International
> Kuala Lumpur Office for Asia Pacific and the Middle East
> Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur,
> Malaysia
> Tel: +60 3 7726 1599
> 
> Empowering Tomorrow’s Consumers 
> CI World Congress, 3-6 May 2011, Hong Kong
> Businesses, governments and civil society are invited to join consumer
> groups from around the world
> for four days of debate and discussion on the issues that matter most
> to consumers. Register now!
> http://www.consumersinternational.org/congress
> Twitter #CICongress
> 
> Read our email confidentiality notice. Don't print this email unless
> necessary.
> 
> 

-- 
Dr Jeremy Malcolm
Project Coordinator
Consumers International
Kuala Lumpur Office for Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia
Tel: +60 3 7726 1599

Empowering Tomorrow’s Consumers
CI World Congress, 3-6 May 2011, Hong Kong

Businesses, governments and civil society are invited to join consumer
groups from around the world for four days of debate and discussion on
the issues that matter most to consumers. Register now!
http://www.consumersinternational.org/congress

Twitter #CICongress

Read our email confidentiality notice. Don't print this email unless
necessary.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3543 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20110129/6c21bbfa/attachment.bin>