[governance] Draft statement on Nairobi meeting programme

Sun Jan 23 14:02:20 EST 2011

I've made one small editorial change below... ("graduated" rather than
"graduate")..

I also, think there should be a paragraph in there about the ways in which
various parties are trying to build copyright protection directly into the
tech--software, hardware and I believe into carriage as well (and the
risks/implications of this... I don't have the words to write that para but
I' would guess others on the list do...

M

-----Original Message-----
From: governance-request at lists.cpsr.org
[mailto:governance-request at lists.cpsr.org] On Behalf Of Marilia Maciel
Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2011 8:10 AM
To: governance at lists.cpsr.org
Subject: Re: [governance] Draft statement on Nairobi meeting programme

... 

 Intellectual property enforcement online and its impact on development and
human rights

Recently there has been a change in the international intellectual property
regime. Rather than substantive law harmonization, international IP
norm-setting is now promoting an enforcement agenda, an increasingly
punitive response to counterfeiting and piracy now being discussed in many
national and international institutions. It is an emerging matrix of new
laws, regulations, technologies, and public and private initiatives designed
to police the use of intellectual property, specially in the digital
environment.

New international standards require countries to increase the level and
territorial extent of intellectual property rights. This trend has
developmental impacts, as countries become less free to support open
platforms for learning, innovating, sharing and producing, while being
required to raise the amount spent on knowledge-based inputs. 

The enforcement agenda also impacts the exercise of rights online. The
adoption of laws that follow the model of  graudated    response in
several countries around the world reveals the trade-offs between the
enforcement agenda and human rights, such as the right to receive and impart
information, the right to privacy and consumer´s rights. Moreover, it puts
ISPs in the position of an Internet police, with the role to oversight
internet users. 

Governance of knowledge and Internet governance become deeply intertwined in
the context of an information society. The debate of this theme in a
multistakeholder forum, such as the IGF, would help to reach a more round
understanding about the impact of this enforcement agenda on human rights,
more specifically on access to knowledge, and on the ability to innovate
online. 

On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Lee W McKnight <lmcknigh at syr.edu> wrote:

Hi,

A quick word of encouragement for Marila to draft a fourth possible a2k
theme, can't hurt right.

But in general I am fine with Jeremy's distillation of three workable themes

Lee

________________________________________
From: governance-request at lists.cpsr.org [governance-request at lists.cpsr.org]
On Behalf Of Marilia Maciel [mariliamaciel at gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2011 7:02 PM

To: governance at lists.cpsr.org
Subject: Re: [governance] Draft statement on Nairobi meeting programme

Hi Jeremy,

I did not suggest it as a forth theme, since you said that we generally only
put forward three topics. If you guys believe that a fourth theme should be
added, I would be happy to draft a text. If three themes seem to be the best
way to go, I would like to ask us to *really* make A2K present in all
discussions as you suggested. For that, we will need to carefully think
about the approach and the names of speakers for the main sessions, who
could link A2K with NN, transborder issues, etc. Of course, workshop
proposals would be also important to reach a more rounded understanding of
these interplays.

Marília

On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Jeremy Malcolm
<jeremy at ciroap.org<mailto:jeremy at ciroap.org>> wrote:
On 23/01/2011, at 6:04 AM, Marilia Maciel wrote:
While I agree with your approach that makes A2K a transversal issue, I
believe it is very important that we go beyond words and really mainstream
it on the debates.
Marilia and Ian, I'm not sure from your comments if you are both saying that
you want to see us putting forward a separate fourth theme (since I don't
see anyone suggesting that we should remove one of the existing three
themes).  Could you clarify and, if that is what you are saying, perhaps
suggest some text?

--
Jeremy Malcolm
Project Coordinator
Consumers International
Kuala Lumpur Office for Asia Pacific and the Middle East
Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia
Tel: +60 3 7726 1599
Empowering Tomorrows Consumers
CI World Congress, 3-6 May 2011, Hong Kong
Businesses, governments and civil society are invited to join consumer
groups from around the world
for four days of debate and discussion on the issues that matter most to
consumers. Register now!
http://www.consumersinternational.org/congress
Twitter #CICongress

Read our email confidentiality
notice<http://www.consumersinternational.org/email-confidentiality>. Don't
print this email unless necessary.

--
Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade
FGV Direito Rio

Center for Technology and Society
Getulio Vargas Foundation
Rio de Janeiro - Brazil

-- 
Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade
FGV Direito Rio

Center for Technology and Society
Getulio Vargas Foundation
Rio de Janeiro - Brazil

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20110123/18475127/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t