[governance] Montreux

[McTim]

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Anriette Esterhuysen <anriette at apc.org> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Back in sane Johannesburg :)
>
> In response to Adam, I also liked Brazil's proposal to begin to discuss
> public policy principles of IG and progressively over time, capturing
> where there is agreement, and differences on these principles .  This
> can be captured in the IGF's outcome 'documents'.
>
> The Brazilian's are drawing on their national experience of thrashing
> out key principles among all stakeholders. It has worked really well for
> them, and I do think the IGF should try something similar.

yes, but while it is much lauded, we still see some ugliness:

http://observingbrazil.com/2011/02/21/the-right-to-information-in-brazil-censorship-fines-for-sharing-wi-fi/


-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t