[governance] on Observers at MAG meeting
McTim
dogwallah at gmail.com
Thu Feb 24 13:33:43 EST 2011
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Anriette Esterhuysen <anriette at apc.org> wrote:
> I would hope that the MAG tries to distill the inputs from the written
> submissions, and the open consultation.
>
> I am not quite sure that is what happened today.
>
> My other observations, as an observer, are:
>
> * The MAG should make use of small group discussions who make proposals
> on content and themes, with these groups then coming back into plenary
>
> * The technical community and the private sector is extremely well
> prepared and organised, and, in attendance. Therefore they are the most
> influential group by far in the MAG.
>
> * Civil society members of the MAG are doing their best, but battling.
>
> * Civil society is prepared in that people have proposals, text and
> ideas, but is not well organised on site and not prepared for effective
> participation in the meeting.
>
> * Government participation is very limited... with good efforts from
> Brazil, India and a handful of northern governments.
>
> * There are some MAG members who don't participate at all. Why are they
> there?
>
> * It is not a very developing country or civil society friendly space.
>
> * I think the private sector and the technical community should reflect
> on their strategies
What is their strategy(ies)?
... they work in the short term, but will they work
> in the long term? They feed into the criticism of the IGF from certain
> governments which, whatever our view of it may be, is not conducive to
> making this process achieve its goals. Their withdrawal from the process
> makes it less and less valuable for those of us who need to and want to
> work with/challenge our governments to deal with basic internet access,
> regulation, openness etc. issues.
How are they withdrawing if they "extremely well
prepared and organised, and, in attendance. Therefore they are the
most influential group by far in the MAG."
??
--
Cheers,
McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
For all other list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
http://www.igcaucus.org/
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list