[governance] Re: Remote participation for the open consultations and MAG meeting

[Adam Peake]

A little disappointing that the CS members of the "MAG" did not speak
up for the rights of observers to speak.  This is something we argued
strongly for some years ago.

Thanks however to Chris Disspain for trying to give us the right to speak.

Adam



On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Jeremy Malcolm <jeremy at ciroap.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 06:46 -0300, Marilia Maciel wrote:
>> Ops, sorry. Only MAG members and IGOs can raise comments. Observers
>> here and online cannot.
>
> Given that the current MAG's mandate has expired, this is unacceptable
> in my opinion.  There ought to be a new MAG in place by now, and since
> there is not, the MAG meeting should be open to participation by all.
> Could one of our IGC MAG members make this point, or at least direct the
> discussion towards when the MAG renewal will take place?
>
> --
> Dr Jeremy Malcolm
> Project Coordinator
> Consumers International
> Kuala Lumpur Office for Asia-Pacific and the Middle East
> Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur,
> Malaysia
> Tel: +60 3 7726 1599
>
> Consumers for Fair Financial Services
> World Consumer Rights Day, 15 March 2011
>
> Join the global consumer movement in demanding access to safe, fair and
> competitive markets in financial services for all.
> http://www.consumersinternational.org/wcrd2011
>
> Read our email confidentiality notice. Don't print this email unless
> necessary.
>
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t