[governance] Provisional suggestion – on the structure of IGF (meeting)

[Roland Perry]

In message 
<AANLkTi=j84ttJz-R7H6hNb_mZJAb-YueRYvYqZSKhQ3C at mail.gmail.com>, at 
22:19:21 on Wed, 23 Feb 2011, Izumi AIZU <aizu at anr.org> writes

>The WG idea is not "inter-sessionaly", rather it is the wrap-up process
>of one cycle of IGF, say Kenya's one be not concluded completely
>at the Nairobi meeting, but designated members of WGS, will work
>after Nairobi to produce a document/product that is the formal outcome
>of the IGF, subject to defined open process including the online feedback
>and open physical meeting, perhaps.

That's what I meant by "inter-sessional". In other words, anything 
substantial (rather than planning) happening in the 51 weeks between one 
IGF main session ending and the next one starting.

Producing a formal outcome sounds a bit like a negotiated text to me. 
(Not arguing whether that's good or bad, but it's a big change).

Of course, everyone's workshops reports they filed after Vilnius is a 
rather different form of document/product from the meeting.

http://intgovforum.org/cms/2010-igf-vilnius/workshop-proposal/reports

Quite a short list, and if filing a report is once again a qualification 
for proposing a workshop (in Nairobi) that'll thin it out quite nicely!
-- 
Roland Perry
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t