[governance] Re: [goverance] Your support for a petition

[Carlos A. Afonso]

Actually there might be a situation in which the gov does not want to
block access to the domain, but dispute the right to it on, say,
cultural grounds (as in my example) -- a dispute in which it acts in
favor of a local cultural asset, for example.

I agree with Avri that "requesting a veto" is equivalent to "filing an
objection".

--c.a.

On 02/21/2011 05:38 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
> But they can do this through national-level blocking, regardless of what ICANN, the USG or we decide now. 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>>
>> So, as I said, govs will always have the right (as any other community)
>> to *request* a veto -- BTW, govs being or not part of the GAC.
>>
>> --c.a.
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
> 
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
> 
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
> 
> 
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t