[governance] US/GAC vs. ICANN

[jefsey]

At 09:13 03/02/2011, Kleinwächter, Wolfgang wrote:
>FYI
>http://www.circleid.com/posts/us_scorecard_for_brussels_draconian_trademark_rules_end_of_privates_sector/ 
>
>Question: How the IGF can help to get individual users interests 
>reflected in the new gTLD process? What ALAC is doing?

I think I fully answered that already. What is interesting is that 
the US agony  over TMs might mean that at the end of the day ICANN 
will side with us. Let have IAB think over it, IETF digest the 
stability and surety that architectural subsidiarity implies, and the 
IUse (Intelligent Use of digital multiple technologies) community 
emerge from considering technical/practical responses to the 
mubarakobama Internet operance, testing them, and IGF.

jfc 

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t