[governance] Re: Why the unilateral US control over generic TLD is dangerous

[McTim]

On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro
<salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com> wrote:
> Check out the second paragraph of the article in this link:
> http://www.dmwmedia.com/news/2011/02/01/us-seizes-domain-spainbased-sports-linking-site-rojadirecta

I am surprised that PIR caved in so quickly...Baptism by fire for
Brian Cute. If, as it seems regitries/registrars are going to abide by
these seizure orders, it seems they would abide by them if they had HQ
in any country.

What is the solution then? A treaty is not going to fly, no country is
going to give up their sovereignty over ccTLDs or com0panies
(registries/registrars) that run in their country.

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t