[governance] SOPA victory for tech community today. Now delayed until 2012.

Fri Dec 16 16:46:20 EST 2011

If lovers of the internet started boycotting Hollywood, in Occupy Hollywood
and everyone gathered momentum in fighting SOPA effects and impacts on an
open and free internet.

Consumers have power when forces combine.

I am happy that Silicon Valley won this round and hope it stays away.
Having said this I believe that intellectual property can be protected and
enforced but not at the expense of an open and free internet.

Sala

On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Lee W McKnight <lmcknigh at syr.edu> wrote:

>  Hi,
>
> Having just been in DC, both the Sopa and Protect IP bills are seen there
> as basically a Northern California vs Southern California, ie Silicon
> Valley v Hollywood, squabble.
>
> So score a round to the Valley.
>
> But Hollywood's not going away.
>
> Unfortuantely even if the rest of us can weigh in, it's likely up to
> Valley heavyweights to also protect the Internet from the Protect IP act,
> just like they belatedly engaged on sopa.
>
> Now reporting from outside the Beltway,
>
> Lee
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* governance at lists.cpsr.org [governance at lists.cpsr.org] on behalf
> of Narine Khachatryan [ms.narine.khachatryan at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, December 16, 2011 4:32 PM
> *To:* governance at lists.cpsr.org
> *Subject:* [governance] SOPA victory for tech community today. Now
> delayed until 2012.
>
>    Dear all,
>
>  Sopa victory for tech community as US House committee adjourns
>
>  Congress to vote at a later date on internet piracy legislation in a
> surprise low to Hollywood and top media firms
>
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/dec/16/congress-delays-vote-on-sopa-internet-piracy
>
>
>
>   The US House Judiciary committee considering the controversial Stop
> Online Piracy <http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/piracy> Act (Sopa)
> abruptly adjourned Friday with no new vote date set. The surprise victory
> for the tech community came amidst a barrage of online criticism and in
> spite of the fact that most politicians on the committee appeared to
> support the act.
>
> On the second day of discussions committee chairman and chief sponsor of
> the legislation, Rep Lamar Smith (R-Texas), conceded to calls for further
> investigation of claims that the legislation will damage the infrastructure
> of the internet <http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/internet>.
>
> Top media firms, including some of the biggest names in Hollywood, have
> been lobbying hard for the legislation claiming online piracy is costing
> them billions in lost sales and jobs.
>
> But executives from Google, Wikipedia and other high profile tech firms
> have accused the committee of pursuing the same strategy used by China to
> censor its internet and claimed the legislation as drafted would damage the
> Internet's global structure.
>
> The online community has rallied against Sopa. Wikipedia founder Jimmy
> Wales threatened to pull his website offline if the legislation wasn't
> amended. The hashtag Sopa has been trending on Twitter this week as people
> worried about its implications.
>
> But Sopa isn't dead. Smith said the hearing would resume at the "earliest
> practical day that Congress is in session." With the Christmas holidays
> coming, the next hearing will be weeks away at the earliest and with the
> 2012 election looming it will become increasingly difficult to schedule an
> early vote.
>
> At the hearing, Rep Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) urged Smith to postpone the
> session until technical experts could be brought in to discuss the impact
> of altering the internet's domain-naming system to fight piracy.
>
> The tech industry's biggest names have come out against Sopa, including
> computer scientist Vint Cerf, one of the founders of the internet. He
> recently warned Sopa would begin "a worldwide arms race of unprecedented
> 'censorship' of the Web." Stuart Baker, former homeland security assistant
> secretary has also warned Sopa would do "great damage to internet security."
>
> Given that the majority of the committee's members seemed to be in favor
> of the legislation, the decision to delay will come as a major blow to the
> media firms that have lobbied hard for its passage. Holmes Wilson,
> co-founder of Fight For The Future, a lobbying group, said: "It's a huge
> victory, if a temporary one. This is not what they wanted."
>
> He said it was clear that the number of people watching the proceedings
> online and discussing it on Twitter and Facebook made it difficult to pass
> the bill without greater scrutiny. "In the past legislation could just have
> been passed with few people noticing. That isn't possible anymore," he said.
>
> The legislation is not the only anti-piracy bill now passing through
> Washington. Another bill, know as Protect IP, is also pending.
>
>
>  Nariné Khachatryan
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
>

-- 
Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala

Tweeter: @SalanietaT
Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro
Cell: +679 998 2851
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20111217/7033a6cb/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t