[governance] Washington Post calls for new gTLD rollout delay

Lee W McKnight lmcknigh at syr.edu
Tue Dec 13 09:35:12 EST 2011


Bill,

I'd agree with you; except it is a US election year.

Which means the level of - discourse? - in DC heads in one direction; influenced by various interests with boatloads of $.

So random acts of silliness in and around Washington are more than possible for the forseeable future.

Caveat emptor (if you are planning to spend serious $ on a gtld).

Lee

________________________________
From: governance at lists.cpsr.org [governance at lists.cpsr.org] on behalf of William Drake [william.drake at uzh.ch]
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 5:13 AM
To: governance at lists.cpsr.org; Narine Khachatryan
Subject: Re: [governance] Washington Post calls for new gTLD rollout delay

The post used to be quite a good paper back in the latter days of the Viet Nam war, Watergate etc.  In the Bush era it moved right to try to compete with the Rev. Moon-owed Washington Times, which was the preferred Fox on paper source for the cowboy boots and big hair brigade.  It still runs a regular front page feature "On Faith" where politicos can find out what Jesus would do about carbon emissions, stem cells, and drones.  It's also really struggled to position itself for the digital market, and it's not hard to believe some lawyer got in the new management's ear and screamed the sky is falling because you may have defensively register wapost.newgltd so clueless readers are not misdirected.

Kieren may be right that ICANN management isn't playing this stuff in most deft manner possible, but I wouldn't regard the post's entry into the fray as some sort of game changer.

Bill


On Dec 12, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Narine Khachatryan wrote:

Dear all,

Washington Post calls for new gTLD rollout delay

by Kieren McCarthy | 11 Dec 2011

The Washington Post has called for the rollout of hundreds of new Internet extensions to be delayed, claiming that the program is "not ready for prime time".
In the lead editorial in Monday's paper, entitled "What's the .rush?" the influential journal takes issue with plans to open out the top level of the Internet and
aims a series of punches at ICANN itself, claiming it is unaccountable, non-responsive and may undermine its own legitimacy by driving ahead with plans to
open up applications on 12 January.

Read more http://news.dot-nxt.com/2011/12/11/washington-post-calls-for-gtld-delay

--

Nariné Khachatryan
Media Education Center
Yerevan, Armenia
http://www.immasin.am <http://www.immasin.am/>
http://www.safe.am/
http://www.mediaeducation.am/



____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
    governance at lists.cpsr.org<mailto:governance at lists.cpsr.org>
To be removed from the list, visit:
    http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
    http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
    http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20111213/edaf2364/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t



More information about the Governance mailing list