[governance] The Big Brother is everywhere now - Assange
Riaz K Tayob
riaz.tayob at gmail.com
Mon Dec 5 09:52:23 EST 2011
... and a problem with legitimacy. Legitimacy and Effectiveness are twin
prongs of international law.
And a holistic perspective is needed, not least because of the use of
the CIRs and other groups to conflate Intellectual Property protected
brand names with domain names... looked at atomistically this may not
have been a problem, but at a particular level of abstraction there are
serious concerns...
On 2011/12/02 02:30 PM, Roland Perry wrote:
> In message
> <CACAaNxia-PPQCza_3yoJSEZH43sweguK9ej_xXTCEbthXqLUUw at mail.gmail.com>,
> at 06:42:46 on Fri, 2 Dec 2011, McTim <dogwallah at gmail.com> writes
>> You are conflating many things here. I would suggest that the
>> governance of CIRs has very little to do with net freedom. How can
>> ICANN, for example, regulate the behavior of Apple, Google or SWIFT?
>
> ...
>
>> If you want to enshrine Big Brother, there is no better way than to
>> give governments free hand to regulate the Internet.
>
> Regulate the Internet, or regulate CIRs? (eg why would governments be
> more successful than ICANN vis-à-vis Apple etc).
>
> In a nutshell we have the problem with debate about regulation - is it
> connectivity, content, or some combination like DNS, that you are
> speaking about?
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
For all other list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
http://www.igcaucus.org/
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list