[governance] Net neutrality..the big picture

McTim dogwallah at gmail.com
Tue Apr 19 10:58:35 EDT 2011


Don't have any links for the EU statement/doc, but here is ISOC reaction:


Internet Society welcomes European Commission backing for open Internet

http://isoc.org/wp/newsletter/?p=3614

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel

On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:
>
>
>> and realised that I was wrong re: NN and developing countries.  NN is a
>> major issue for the developing world, but we have overlooked it, as we
>> don't call it NN, we call it censorship.
> [Milton L Mueller]
>
> Yes! This was a major point I made in the 2007 IGP paper on NN.
> http://internetgovernance.org/pdf/NetNeutralityGlobalPrinciple.pdf
>
>> Recent popular examples from the developing world of NN violations
>> include, Tunisia, Egypt, Iran, Burma, China and most recently in Uganda,
>> where some ppl wanted to "walk to work" in protest of rising fuel
>> prices.
>
> [Milton L Mueller]
>
> Yes, and while it is true, as Fouad points out, developed world businesses in some cases share responsibility for this, as for example by selling them the technology to make internet blocking easier, it is the states in those countries who create the demand and provide the funds for that technology.
>
>> So our workshop should focus, IMHO on what the real current NN issues
>> are at the moment, those things that currently violate our right to
>> communicate with each other.  So lets hold governments collective feet
>> to the fire on this.  If we want real NN, then we have to start from
>> First Principles.  Any website/content, any time on any device.  If we
>> focus on some alleged victimisation by Big Content and Big Providers
>> that may or may not happen at some future point in time, we will be
>> doing a disservice to all those whose rights are currently being
>> violated by the biggest anti-NN violators out there, our governments!
>>
> [Milton L Mueller]
>
> I agree  but would phrase it a bit differently. Don't let big Content and big ISPs off the hook, but don't let states off the hook, either.
> For more info about the implications of this approach, see the
> http://blog.internetgovernance.org/blog/_archives/2011/4/14/4795243.html
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t



More information about the Governance mailing list