[governance] IGF relevance?

[Fouad Bajwa]

That is my feeling too. Everything seems to stop with EU and US
centric NN discussions and debates. The rest of the world can sit
quietly and wait while everything is okay on that side and the rules
are set for the rest to follow.

NN seems to be a no go area or no discuss issue for the developing
world and thats where the primary questions arises to how can
developing regions take on this debate because the neutrality of the
network is as important for them and their sustainability too.

The developed perspective usually is that what they say is what is
authority over any other discussion and I cannot buy that.

-- FoO

On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 6:33 PM, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday 14 April 2011 08:34 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>
> I am going to raise some eyebrows and question the decision to do a Network
> neutrality workshop. This is an issue that is being and will be handled by
> national regulatory authorities.
>
> Can you tell me about some developing countries (other than Brazil, and
> perhaps recently Chile) where anything is happening on Net Neutrality?
>
> The positions of the various actors and interest groups are well known and
> well-aired. Nothing the IGF says or does will have much impact on what
> happens in this space. The US Congress will probably negate the current FCC
> rules and the US will have to either pass new legislation or find some other
> way to pursue those policy goals; the IGF does not enter into the equation.
> The same can be said for Europe: the EU and national regulatory authorities
> are actively debating this, and it is the opinions of the nra's, DG INFO, DG
> MARKT and its competition law that matter, not IGF.
>
> So that is where your world stops :). Yes, US and EU are doing fine at home
> on NN, but can we, rest of us, not just wait till US and EU NN rules are
> finalized and through their economic (also political and social) might
> imposed on the rest of the world? By your permission, we are just seeking
> democratic management of the medium that is touted as a great democratic
> force. Do you agree to such an objective? do you want to contribute?
>
> parminder
>
>
>
> On the other hand, there are developments in IP addressing that cry out for
> a global forum to work out a new policy. For some background, see this
> recent IGP blog article:
> http://blog.internetgovernance.org/blog/_archives/2011/3/25/4778257.html
> In facing a controversial issue that seemed to require global policy but go
> beyond the mandate of ARIN, the head of ARIN recently asked on a public
> list, sincerely, which venue could be used to discuss the issue?
>
> It is abundantly clear that on a few key internet governance issues, ranging
> from Wikileaks
>
>  to IP addressing there are inadequate globalized institutions.
>
> One reason IGF is losing relevance, is that IGF's leadership seems to be
> utterly blind when it comes to distinguishing between issues where it can be
> entrepreneurial and fill gaps in the current institutional environment, and
> issues where it has no real capacity to contribute anything.
> It seems that IGF always falls prey to the disease of UN organizations,
> which is to create opportunities for politicians and others who enjoy
> publicity to intone pleasing platitudes on gigantic problems which it has no
> capacity to solve, while completely avoiding the hard work of solving
> smaller, less glamorous problems it can actually do something about.
>
> --MM
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t