[governance] IMPORTANT: 10 members required to approve a

[parminder]

Sorry, I see that my input may have come a little too late....

Though, will still request you to consider whether we really need an 
amendment which will enable us to use the same nomcom for multiple 
functions but not the same list of volunteers for two or more nomcoms 
for different functions, especially if these were distinct and 
separately very important.... But will go with whatever be the process 
that co-coordinators decide from here on. Parminder

On Monday 27 September 2010 11:33 AM, Jeremy Malcolm wrote:
> On 27/09/2010, at 2:00 PM, Divina MEIGS wrote:
>
>    
>> I support the proposal
>>      
> Thanks everyone, we now have enough support to put this amendment to a vote, which I'll do in conjunction with the coordinator ballot as soon as I have the last remaining candidate's statement and have compiled the latest voter list.  No need for more responses until then.
>
>    
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20100927/bbff5153/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t