[governance] THIRD draft response to MAG questionnaire

[Roland Perry]

In message <4CAF7812.2070608 at gmail.com>, at 15:29:14 on Fri, 8 Oct 2010, 
Ginger Paque <gpaque at gmail.com> writes
>Sorry to introduce a new point at this late date, but I think we should 
>be asking that the MAG structure implement the rotation strategy that 
>was introduced a few years ago. By now we should have seen a complete 
>rotation of the original members, allowing for continuous renewal and 
>new ideas.

Do you think the existing rule is "change a third (any third) of the 
members each year", or "everyone has a maximum of three years" - which 
forces the renewal of only the longest-serving third?

I used to assume it was the latter, but my observations suggest it might 
be closer to the former.
-- 
Roland Perry
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t