AW: [governance] A Group of ITU Members vs. the IGF

[Jeremy Malcolm]

On 10/10/2010, at 5:45 PM, Kleinwächter, Wolfgang wrote:

> 2. The IGC should work on a broader document on the future of Internet Governance with special parts on "improvement" of ICANN and the IGF. A first version could be presented at the forthcoming November IGF/MAG consultations in Geneva. 

This would tie in very well with the statement that we should make to UNDESA about Enhanced Cooperation by 1 December (http://tinyurl.com/enhanced-cooperation, background to this is no longer online at the UN, but see instead http://tinyurl.com/brazil-ec-blog).  Indeed, for convenience, I suggest that perhaps they should be one and the same statement.

I will be travelling a lot in the next month or so, so I will consult with Izumi about who should guide this process.

-- 
Jeremy Malcolm
Project Coordinator
Consumers International
Kuala Lumpur Office for Asia Pacific and the Middle East
Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Tel: +60 3 7726 1599

CI is 50
Consumers International marks 50 years of the global consumer movement in 2010.
Celebrate with us as we continue to support, promote and protect consumer rights around the world. 
http://www.consumersinternational.org/50

Read our email confidentiality notice. Don't print this email unless necessary.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20101010/c11ad7e0/attachment.bin>