[governance] another comment I made on the function, Chair,

[Baudouin SCHOMBE]

Basically the text is good, I think it must be emphasized the intensive use
of online tools, webcast, audio and video, transcripts, other tools for
remote participation.

But it will also enhance this experience by providing a multi-linguistic
approach to enable remote participants to contribute to debates.
Experience DiploFoundation and Cisco were 95% very good success at Vilnius
IGF.
Moreover, it will also, for the developing countries, seeking to involve UN
Agencies  both in national and regional level collaborating with  maximum
pana instititions like African Union for Africa, ECA, ADB (African
Development Bank) etc. ..
Sub regional IGFs may serve as platform for restitution with the
participation of sub-regional organizations like SADC, ECCAS, ECOWAS,
COMESA, etc. ...


 BAUDOUIN



2010/11/24 Izumi AIZU <iza at anr.org>

> I prepared the followings and read out now, after the coffee break.
> I did not attribute this to CS IGC, but hope you all agree.
>
> izumi
>
>
> -----
> Additionally, since the questionnaire did not ask this directly – it
> is somewhere in between Q2 and Q3, I would like to mention the
> following and seek for your support as an formal input to the CSTD
> consultation.
> That is the question of what should be preserved and enhanced from the
> IGF works so far. In addition to what should be improved or added, as
> new mechanisms.
>
> I think that the success and achievements of innovative implementation
> of multi-stakeholder works of IGF in the traditional UN context which
> are not really easy I am sure, were very much driven by the Chair, Mr.
> Nitin Desai and also the secretariat team, headed by Mr. Markus
> Kummer. I think no one disagrees with this.
>
> We feel this should also be included in the report not for any
> diplomatic reasons per se, for certain practical reasons as well. In
> view of coming new Chair and Executive Secretariat as Nitin and Marks
> already indicated their retirement from IGF works, we like to identify
> elements of IGF to be carried on by the new team. Extensive use of
> online tools, webcast, audio and visual, transcripts, other tools for
> remote participation, are all important parts of IGF. Today, for
> example, we do not have remote participation, webcast which we had
> thought it’s there. Seating arrangements, registration practices are
> also all part of implementation for multi-stakeholder.
>
> I am sure that the new secretariat will be given opportunity to
> receive briefings from the existing team members before they leave so
> that all the experiences and skills will not be lost and we start over
> from scratch.
> As the language of the questionnaire, and also that of text of UN GA
> Resolution on IGF do not quite include the accomplishment of Nitin,
> Markus and his team, I think it is more than appropriate to recognize
> these.
>
> -------
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>
> For all list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20101124/ba8cd3d0/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t