[governance] MAG meeting summary

[Adam Peake]

Summary of yesterday's MAG meeting online 
<http://intgovforum.org/cms/2010/MAG.Summary.23.11.2010.pdf>

Would have liked to see more emphasis on the MAG as an entity 
required to base its recommendations on community comment. Not to 
ignore things as it has in the past. As described, all perhaps a 
little top-down.

And if the non-govt stakeholders are to select their own 
representatives (even with some 'triage' method), which is very good, 
then all should be required to use some transparent and open 
selection process.  The caucus has tried, it would be very good to 
see the private sector and technical community attempt the same.

And no mention of removing the Special Advisors to the Chair: MAG 
members by any other name.  They are a bit of an abomination when all 
the other efforts to transparency are considered.

Adam

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t