[governance] <important> Consensus Call for CSTD IGF

[Ian Peter]

I¹m a little confused Izumi and others might be as well. The email text of
your message below contains a couple of clauses which you have deleted in
the final version of the document, (which can only be viewed as an
attachment). But the email does not make clear to me that the bold text in
your email message is  the  deleted text.

However,  I support the statement made in the attached document.

Ian Peter



From: Izumi Aizu <iza at anr.org>
Reply-To: <governance at lists.cpsr.org>, Izumi Aizu <iza at anr.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:12:04 +0900
To: <governance at lists.cpsr.org>
Subject: [governance] <important> Consensus Call for CSTD IGF Questionnaire

Dear list,
Thank you for the comments on the 2nd Draft and here I made a few
changes according to the comments. As this is our [rough] consensus
text, I have deleted the ones which received explicit
objections/disagreement.

We need to know how many do support this final draft, how many
are not happy with it with specific comments or reasons if any.

Unfortunately, because I have not mastered how to create the online poll
and Jeremy is not reachable at the moment, I would like to put
the portions with changes below, attached the Word file for the
full version, and call for Consensus.

Please reply to this thread.

As the deadline is Friday, Nov 19, that's tomorrow already here in Tokyo,
we many not be able to wait for the full 48 hours, but hope it is Ok with
you
this time.

Thank you for your support and understanding.

izumi

----------------

1. What do you consider the most important achievements of the first five
IGF meetings? 

IGF created the space for dialogue by all stakeholders in an open, inclusive
manner. Thisese emergence and development of the multistakeholder principle
and practice are perhaps the biggest contribution IGF has achieved so far.
It helped many participants to understand the issues of their interest, as
well as to understand how other actors understand, act and accept their
issues. Emergence of Regional and National IGF with multistakeholder
approach is another achievement.

 We also note that there are frustrations expressed that IGF process has not
directly produced real tangible outcomes.
9.Do you have any other comments?

IGF must focus exclusively on public policy and governance issues. It should
avoid providing standard educational workshops where some experts explain
how to implement certain technologies or how these technologies work.

--------










____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20101118/a1b7ff23/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t