[governance] FOURTH DRAFT statement on enhanced cooperation
Roland Perry
roland at internetpolicyagency.com
Sun Nov 14 03:59:21 EST 2010
In message <4CDB0DC0.9080204 at eff.org>, at 13:25:20 on Wed, 10 Nov 2010,
Katitza Rodriguez <katitza at eff.org> writes
> For example, it is dangerous to see the Budapest Convention exported
>to other countries, as it has serious implications for citizen's
>fundamental rights.
Citizens also need the right not online safety.
>Despite the serious concerns that the Budapest Convention / Council of
>Europe itself contain, the harm to third countries outside Europe, for
>instance, Latin America is dangerous. While the EU for instance has
>the Ecommerce Directive, The Data Protection Directive, the E-Privacy
>Directive, Charter of Fundamental Rights, and other check and balance
>in place etc, many countries lack of these regulatory frameworks
It's my understanding that the Council of Europe (which is a human
rights organisation, not a policing one) will only allow countries to
sign up to the Budapest Convention, if they also agree to implement
sufficient human rights safeguards as well.
--
Roland Perry
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list