[governance] FINAL? DRAFT statement on enhanced cooperation

[parminder]

Baudouin

All Partnership with -OECD, with the US, with EU - are fine.

My question however is specific

What is the problem with the IGC asking for a global institutional 
framework for developing Internet related public policies that includes 
all countries, and their stakeholders, of a similar kind that that OECD/ 
CoE already has?

This question is especially to seen in the context of the fact that IGC 
members have enthusiastically supported and engaged with the mentioned 
OECD framework.

Why is the need of participation of developing countries, with their all 
stakeholders, not considered relevant or important. That is the simple 
thing that I am seeking with my EC related proposal.

Parminder



On Thursday 11 November 2010 05:40 PM, Baudouin SCHOMBE wrote:
>
> Parminder concretely in the context of strengthening cooperation or to 
> strengthen cooperation, it would be wise for formal exchanges are 
> planned between the OECD and actors from other continents to harmonize 
> our views to build a compelling case.
> I think this is also part of the delicate task of civil society 
> entities. I also understand that such an approach requires costs that 
> we must certainly raise.OECD is an ideal partner, especially for 
> developing countries.
> The process is still long, but if we have land in 2015 with force and 
> conviction, it would be desirable to correct any mistakes along the 
> way from Tunis 2005.
>
>
>
>
> SCHOMBE BAUDOUIN
> *COORDONNATEUR DU CENTRE AFRICAIN D'ECHANGE CULTUREL (CAFEC)
>  ACADEMIE DES TIC
> *COORDONNATEUR NATIONAL REPRONTIC
> *MEMBRE FACILITATEUR GAID AFRIQUE
> *NCUC/GNSO MEMBER (ICANN)
>
> Téléphone mobile: +243998983491/+243811980914
> email: b.schombe at gmail.com <mailto:b.schombe at gmail.com>
> blog: http://akimambo.unblog.fr <http://akimambo.unblog.fr/>
>
>
>
> 2010/11/11 parminder <parminder at itforchange.net 
> <mailto:parminder at itforchange.net>>
>
>
>     Hi All
>
>     I am still not able to understand how so many of those who are
>     against any new institutional framework for evolving global IG
>     related public policies, which is democratic in inclusion of all
>     countries and stakeholders,  have enthusiastically supported a
>     similar framework among OECD countries? I mean the OECD's
>     Committee For Information, Computer and Communication Policy,
>     which has a very active portfolio for helping develop Internet
>     policies, esp those with trans-border ramification. Many CS
>     members in the IGC have actively organized themselves to associate
>     with the work of this OECD's institutional framework.
>
>     Why should such a framework not exist at a global level? And I do
>     think that OECD's framework is not multistakeholder enough. My
>     proposal is for a global framework of similar kind (to OECD's)
>     that will help develop globally applicable Internet related public
>     policies, which is what the 'enhanced cooperation' process is
>     about, that is much more multistakeholder than the existing OECD one
>
>     I request a specific response for those who have supported the
>     OECD framework rather enthusiastically, and this includes most
>     here on the IGC list who now oppose similar new institutional
>     developments at the global level , how do they justify this
>     opposition now, for a similar global institutional framework.
>
>     Unfortunately, many developing country IGC members here have gone
>     along with this opposition to a global UN anchored body, which can
>     be  no different from the OECD arrangement. I am able to
>     unserstand thier stanc eeven more.
>
>     Should we depend on OECD to make global Internet policies. That is
>     what is being said in this support for a OECD framework but
>     opposition to a similar global framework one, for addressing the
>     urgent need for global Interent related public policies. .
>
>     For this reason I cannot support the present draft statement. But
>     if someone can give me some justification clarifying the above
>     paradox, I am very much willing to listen.
>
>     Parminder
>
>
>
>     ____________________________________________________________
>     You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.cpsr.org <mailto:governance at lists.cpsr.org>
>     To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>     <mailto:governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org>
>
>     For all list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>
>     Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20101111/cfb96f42/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t