[governance] It's Time to Stop ICANN's Top-Level Domain (TLD)
Roland Perry
roland at internetpolicyagency.com
Sat Nov 6 04:09:20 EDT 2010
In message
<93F4C2F3D19A03439EAC16D47C591DDE0330006DC9 at suex07-mbx-08.ad.syr.edu>,
at 17:01:33 on Fri, 5 Nov 2010, Lee W McKnight <lmcknigh at syr.edu> writes
>Ian, while you may not care for the decision to permit more gTLDs, but
>compared to the arbitrariness of prior processes which prevented that
>or made it almost impossible, it is a big big step forward toward more
>transparent admin procedures within ICANN, and hence indeed a step
>forward for internet governance. In my view. Whether or not we feel
>specific new gTLDs are good or bad or succeed or fail, it shouldn't be
>to you or me - or ICANN - to prevent suitably qualified folks from
>giving it a go.
We should not forget the history - new gTLDs have been introduced
steadily over the last ten years; starting with .biz .info and .museum,
and finishing (I would say) with .post this year; and has always been a
prime objective of the ICANN process.
An early list of applications is at the bottom of this page:
http://www.icann.org/en/tlds/app-index.htm
But later on, a problem arose with the application for .xxx, in so far
as the decision-making process (to use Vint Cerf's words) "failed to
converge". Every time it came to a vote, the board seemed to be more
polarised than before. Whereas he was felt that good governance should
result in a debate steadily converging towards either a "yes" or a "no".
He therefore resolved to create (and I simplify) a new "one size fits
all" approval process which would streamline the situation and remove as
much as possible of the subjective decision-making. Which is the DAG etc
that we see coming ever closer to delivery.
The debates within the DAG process are essentially about the merits (or
otherwise) of quarantining definable parts of the potential namespace
which overlap with trademarks, geographical names, and most recently
MOPO issues. My favourite example is .lincoln which is a trademark of
the Ford Motor Company, the Capital of Nebraska, and a Cathedral City
and County Town in the UK.
--
Roland Perry
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
For all list information and functions, see:
http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list