[governance] Our strategy, work plan and outreach

Wed Nov 3 05:20:31 EDT 2010

Hi Imran,

it was just an example http://www.iab.org/about/workshops/privacy/ and it is
not related to IETF meeting which will be held in Beijing.

Rafik

2010/11/3 Imran Ahmed Shah <ias_pk at yahoo.com>

> Dear Rafik,
>
> ....According to the IAB Chair.....,
> The IETF 79 technical plenary is planned for Monday November 8  (not on
> Thursday!) and we hope to welcome you between 16:30-19:30 in "Valey". They
> will start with the IAB and IRTF chair's report.
>
> The technical heart of the plenary will focus on IPv6 Operations and
> Transitional issues. It is organized as a panel discussion followed by Q&A,
> and discussions on the topic. For more details, see below.
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Imran Ahmed Shah
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak at gmail.com>
> *To:* governance at lists.cpsr.org; Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* Jeremy Malcolm <jeremy at ciroap.org>; Izumi AIZU <aizu at anr.org>
> *Sent:* Wed, 3 November, 2010 13:14:50
>
> *Subject:* Re: [governance] Our strategy, work plan and outreach
>
> Hello,
>
> I don't see why we should follow sequential flow strategy->working plan
> ->outreach vs parallel flow, I think that Izumi mentioned having
> facilitators in each group who ,I guess, are tasked to
> coordinate between the different groups permitting intercommunication
> between them. and task like outreach is loosely coupled to strategy
> (outreach should be permanent and not limited in time)
>
> I agree with McTim about working in those different space that he
> mentioned, e.g W3C and IAB organize jointly a workshop about privacy a topic
> which interest many IGC members, how can we participate there? what about
> RIRs etc . but we need to explore what we can do there in regard of our
> resources.
>
> I think a separate list make more sense and work more easy and smooth. the
> lists will be definitely public and open to everybody to join. for topic
> like strategy many threads will be probably started and having a defined
> list is more appropriate. the facilitators or leaders of each group should
> report to the whole list regularly and the co-coordinators will be present
> anyway.
>
> Rafik
>
> 2010/11/3 Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel at gmail.com>
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>>
>> I am sorry I missed the beginning of the discussion. Presidential
>> elections in Brazil (great outcome, by the way!) and a short trip right
>> after it have kept me away for some days.
>>
>>
>> After going through the thread, I would like to make just a few quick
>> comments:
>>
>>
>> 1) *Strategy*: I totally agree with the need for a broader scope,
>> mentioned by McTim. Although IGF is one of the main concerns, there are
>> other important issues that need to be taken into account in order to plan a
>> solid and coherent strategy.
>>
>>
>> Although I am very glad to see many younger people volunteering to be part
>> of the “strategy” group (and I would like to volunteer as well), this is a
>> topic in which the views of more experienced people is fundamental, so I
>> hope it is implied that many of the known “faces” on the list will be there
>> as well!
>>
>>
>> Regarding the *procedure of the discussions* I just have one concern.
>> Strategy is the heart of everything we will be doing, it is the base for the
>> working plan and the outreach (others will be encouraged to join us
>> depending on our positions). Because of the importance of the topic,
>> wouldn’t it be good to carry out this discussion here on the IGC list? This
>> would be positive for transparency and any interested person would have the
>> chance to jump in, lowering the barriers to enter the debate.  I have
>> seen complicated discussions taking place here on the list, and moderators
>> have successfully organized them in different threads. Separate lists could
>> be created to other areas of discussion. Just a though.
>>
>>
>> 2) *Working plan:* I believe the group involved in the working plan does
>> not need to wait for a strategy to be agreed upon. An important task that
>> could start right now would be to work on the document proposed by Wolfgang
>> "Internet Governance 2015: Priorities for Civil Society" (historical
>> chapter, an overvierw about main issues and institutions, etc.). Strategy
>> will be added to this document as rough consensus is achieved.
>>
>>
>> 3) *Outreach:* I agree that to start an effort of outreach, we need to
>> have a clearer idea of who we are and who is missing among us. Do we (or
>> moderators) have an idea? Should we organize a questionnaire, like the one
>> proposed by Sivasubramanian?
>>
>>
>> Just to reinforce, I volunteer to work with strategy and I will assist in
>> every way I can with outreach. We have developed a good network of contacts
>> because of remote participation.
>>
>>
>> Best wishes,
>>
>> Marília
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Jeremy Malcolm <jeremy at ciroap.org> wrote:
>>
>>>   On 03/11/2010, at 2:01 AM, shaila mistry wrote:
>>>
>>>  If we are to follow the three teams/lists strategy we still needs to be
>>> open to one another to enable greater transparency and participation.Often
>>> viewing a discussion on one list may stimulate interest and pertinent
>>> comments from members of  another.
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes they are all publicly archived, at the links I sent before.  Also, if
>>> you want to be able to post to the list without receiving the messages, then
>>> join it and change your receiving settings to "No mail".
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> *Jeremy Malcolm
>>> Project Coordinator*
>>> Consumers International
>>> Kuala Lumpur Office for Asia Pacific and the Middle East
>>> Lot 5-1 Wisma WIM, 7 Jalan Abang Haji Openg, TTDI, 60000 Kuala Lumpur,
>>> Malaysia
>>> Tel: +60 3 7726 1599
>>> *CI is 50*
>>> Consumers International marks 50 years of the global consumer movement in
>>> 2010.
>>> Celebrate with us as we continue to support, promote and protect consumer
>>> rights around the world.
>>> *http://www.consumersinternational.org/50*
>>>
>>> Read our email confidentiality notice<http://www.consumersinternational.org/Templates/Internal.asp?NodeID=100521&int1stParentNodeID=89765>.
>>> Don't print this email unless necessary.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade
>> FGV Direito Rio
>>
>> Center for Technology and Society
>> Getulio Vargas Foundation
>> Rio de Janeiro - Brazil
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>     governance at lists.cpsr.org
>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>>     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org
>>
>> For all list information and functions, see:
>>     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>>
>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20101103/82d65d31/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.cpsr.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     governance-unsubscribe at lists.cpsr.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t